[AG-TECH] Fwd: Access Grid

John I Quebedeaux Jr johnq at lsu.edu
Tue Oct 28 11:41:04 CST 2003


I'll let better minds tackle the details but will throw in my 2 cents 
and say that last Friday I found myself in a situation with our quick 
bridge and a NAT'd address where the RAT worked fine but the VIC did 
not connect for video coming back to the bridged machine (our portable 
AG node nicknamed "Wilbur"). Thankfully, the network folks at the site 
understood the dilemma and without any fuss went ahead and moved me 
outside their firewall and let me borrow a static address so I could 
continue the setup for 90 minute demo that evening.

The network admin could tell me that the VIC connection wasn't getting 
established back from the bridge through the NAT'd address so only 
outgoing video was working. RAT didn't have a problem. The static 
address took care of the issue, we were short on time to troubleshoot.

So, the symptom was: everyone could see me and I was blind for about 30 
minutes while we worked this out. I was on a NAT'd address behind a 
firewall. They had setup ports 50012/50013 -RAT, 50014/50015 -VIC, 5001 
DPPT for me to get through the firewall.

-John Q.
-- 
John I. Quebedeaux, Jr.
Computer Manager / Louisiana Biomedical Research Network
LSU Biological Sciences / 131 Life Sciences
e-mail: johnq at lsu.edu / web: http://lbrn.lsu.edu
phone: 225-578-0062 / fax: 225-578-2597

On Oct 28, 2003, at 10:17 AM, Sheryl Hurley wrote:

>
>  Hi everyone,
>  I thought I'd send this to the AG Tech list, to see if anyone has
>  any helpful suggestions for the Digital Pueblo people.  I am not
>  sure what their problem is.
>
>  Thanks,
>  Sheryl
>
>  Begin forwarded message:
>
>     From: Glenn A Huval <magius at unm.edu>
>
>
>
>
>     Hello everyone,
>
>     As Hue already mentioned, we are going to be heading up to SFCC
>     early on Wednesday (2:30 roughly).  Sheryl has volunteered to
>     come with us to Santa Fe and work with CY (who will be over at
>     HPC in Albuquerque).
>
>     So here's the setup, for those who don't know....  The
>     QuickBridge is being ran at HPC.  Both Brad (at NHCC) and I (at
>     SFCC) are connecting to the QuickBridge through ports 50372 and
>     50374.  Brad gets Audio and Video from my site and anyone else
>     connected to the bridge, and I get nothing (I do see myself,
>     though I'm not sure of the significance of that).
>
>     Now we think we can solve this by forwarding ports 50372 and
>     50374 (UDP and TCP) to some static IP address that we can
>     access from the Media Lab with the laptop.  I know the people
>     working on the firewall said they already opened the ports...
>     but since all the IP addresses at SFCC are local only, there is
>     no way to communicate through those ports from the outside, so
>     by open that must mean for connections initiated from inside.
>     I'm still unsure about the network setup there at SFCC though,
>     I was told it's a firewall, but I get the impression it's
>     actually a NAT router or some kind of NAT setup... if it is a
>     NAT then we definitely have to forward the ports.  I know
>     normal programs can get through a NAT no problem (most requests
>     initiated from inside are let through), but I think the
>     QuickBridge.
>
>     The one thing we aren't sure of is whether or not the
>     QuickBridge is trying to send the video and audio back to the
>     SFCC router/firewall, or back to the local IP
>     (192.168.xxx.xxx).  If it's going to the router, then
>     forwarding should work... if it isn't I think we are SOL.  This
>     is what we should find out on Wednesday....
>
>     Maybe we can have those ports forwarded by Wednesday 2:30?  Or
>     perhaps an explanation of the network if SFCC isn't running a
>     NAT at all?
>
>     Glenn >=O
>
>     P.S. For those aware, if I got something wrong about the AG or
>     the possible solution please e-mail something out.  Hate to be
>     giving faulty info.
>
>
>  -Sheryl Hurley
>  -Multimedia Development Specialist
>  -HPC at UNM
>  -505.277.5460
>
>
>




More information about the ag-tech mailing list