[AG-TECH] PAL vs. NTSC
Osland, CD (Chris)
C.D.Osland at rl.ac.uk
Wed Feb 26 08:37:45 CST 2003
re PAL - it works!
Can't remember whether Belgium followed France and went for
SECAM (probably not - in many ways Belgium is more German
than French) but PAL and SECAM are close cousins (50 Hz,
625 lines etc). I would totally recommend a 'native' (i.e. PAL
when in a PAL country) setup - using NTSC will enormously
increase costs in the long run.
Chris Osland Office tel: +44
(0) 1235 446565
Digital Media and Access Grid Medialab tel: +44 (0)
BIT Department Access Grid room tel: +44
(0) 1235 445666
e-mail: C.D.Osland at rl.ac.uk Fax: +44
(0) 1235 445597
CLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory (Bldg. R18)
Chilton, DIDCOT, Oxon OX11 0QX, UK
[The contents of this email are confidential and are for the use of the
intended recipient only.
If you are not the intended recipient do not take any action on it or show
it to anyone else,
but return this email to the sender and delete your copy of it.]
From: Nolan, Kevin [NCSUS] [mailto:knolan at ncsus.jnj.com]
Sent: 26 February 2003 12:27
To: 'ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov'
Subject: [AG-TECH] PAL vs. NTSC
We have a location in Belgium that we have a few AG setup's and I was
wondering if the PAL format will work with that setup? In the past we have
shipped NTSC to the location but we are moving to buying direct in the
country for equipment. The vendor can get PAL but they are not sure of
NTSC. Would anyone that has tried PAL have any thoughts or can they
confirm it works? I have tried this conversion with a vBrick during testing
and it did not work.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ag-tech