"PIM-5-SA_ENCAP_INVALID: Bad SA" messages
Gordon Rogier
grogier at greatplains.net
Tue Jul 18 10:37:11 CDT 2000
At this time, this only appears to me to be roughly "coincidental" at
best. If I do detect a more precise relationship, I will make note of it.
I just wanted to share the observation for now. thanks.
--*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*--
Gordon Rogier grogier at greatplains.net
Network Engineer 785-864-0381wk 785-550-4468 cell
Great Plains Network 785-864-9330 FAX
On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, Tony Rimovsky wrote:
> Update from Juniper as of 7/5/00:
>
> "There is no patch for this yet. PR9236 is a low priority PR because it not
> being service affecting. Is this causing more problems than cluttering up
> the logs? If so, please let me know so we can re-evaluate priority level."
>
> Juniper described the problem as "incorrectly sending MSDP SA packet
> when a PIM null register is received."
More information about the ag-tech
mailing list