"PIM-5-SA_ENCAP_INVALID: Bad SA" messages

Gordon Rogier grogier at greatplains.net
Tue Jul 18 10:37:11 CDT 2000


At this time, this only appears to me to be roughly "coincidental" at
best. If I do detect a more precise relationship, I will make note of it.
I just wanted to share the observation for now.  thanks.

--*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*--
Gordon Rogier                        grogier at greatplains.net            
Network Engineer                     785-864-0381wk 785-550-4468 cell
Great Plains Network                 785-864-9330 FAX

On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, Tony Rimovsky wrote:
>  Update from Juniper as of 7/5/00:
> 
> "There is no patch for this yet.  PR9236 is a low priority PR because it not
> being service affecting.  Is this causing more problems than cluttering up
> the logs?  If so, please let me know so we can re-evaluate priority level."
> 
> Juniper described the problem as "incorrectly sending MSDP SA packet
> when a PIM null register is received."





More information about the ag-tech mailing list