Fwd: [AG-TECH] text backchannel confusion

Mary Fritsch fritsch at mcs.anl.gov
Tue Jan 4 23:09:07 CST 2005


can we make a statement on this, I actually get this question with each 
meeting...


>Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 16:19:30 -0500
>From: Jennifer Teig von Hoffman <jtvh at bu.edu>
>User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103)
>X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
>To: "'ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov'" <ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov>
>Subject: [AG-TECH] text backchannel confusion
>X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at mailgw.mcs.anl.gov
>X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0
>         tests=USER_AGENT
>         version=2.55
>X-Spam-Level:
>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
>Sender: owner-ag-tech at mcs.anl.gov
>
>Hi everybody, and especially ANL folks,
>
>I'm a bit confused about what we're all supposed to be doing for text 
>backchannel communications in present-day AG 2. Were the SC Global 
>instructions meant to be generalized to ongoing use, until jabber is 
>integrated into the Venue Client?
>
>http://www-unix.mcs.anl.gov/fl/research/accessgrid/software/jabber.html
>
>My hunch is that this is the case, but I'm not sure. Plus if that's the 
>case I don't think it's widely understood, so I'm wondering if I should 
>throw together an AGDP document to replace my "Venues MOO" doc, about 
>backchannel use in general.
>
>- Jennifer
>
. mary fritsch . futures lab . mcs . argonne national lab . 630 252 5297 .







More information about the ag-dev mailing list