Fwd: More information about Tribal Virtual Network issue

[Robert Olson]

It's difficult to say without knowing what exactly is going on with the 
low-bandwidth room and node, and how and who is doing the bridging.

--bob

At 01:54 PM 12/1/2003, Mary Fritsch wrote:
>any insight?  they already gave insors a heads up, but this was the first 
>I had heard of this issue...
>
>
>>From: "Lee Derks" <derksl at unm.edu>
>>To: "Mary Fritsch" <fritsch at mcs.anl.gov>
>>Subject: More information about Tribal Virtual Network issue
>>Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 12:45:10 -0700
>>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
>>X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0
>>         tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE
>>         version=2.55
>>X-Spam-Level:
>>X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
>>
>>Hi Mary,
>>
>>     I really enjoyed the conversation today and also your advice was 
>> very helpful. When I tried to communicate with the inSORS TVN members, 
>> they had to do a bridge connection to the Bridgeport room before I could 
>> see them. There was really no reason why we chose the Bridgeport room, 
>> it just seemd good at the time. I am going to connect my AG2 PIG to the 
>> University of NM room and see if I can view it from the inSORS software 
>> this afternoon.
>>
>>Thanks & have a great day
>>Lee Derks
>
>
>mary fritsch . futures lab . mcs . argonne national lab . 630 252 5297