FW: Open Mash Vic encryption for the Access Grid
Ivan R. Judson
judson at mcs.anl.gov
Fri Sep 27 14:41:33 CDT 2002
There's the answer. Sounds like he's pulling his hair out, notice he
cc'd the om-developers (which I think was an accident).
--Ivan
..........
Ivan R. Judson .~. http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~judson
Futures Laboratory .~. 630 252 0920
Argonne National Laboratory .~. 630 252 6424 Fax
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lawrence A. Rowe [mailto:Rowe at bmrc.berkeley.edu]
> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 2:28 PM
> To: judson at mcs.anl.gov
> Cc: 'Open Mash Developers'
> Subject: Re: Open Mash Vic encryption for the Access Grid
>
>
> "Ivan R. Judson" wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We've just realized (after being asked by others) that in
> order for OM
> > Vic to fulfill our AG needs, we need to figure out how encryption
> > works (if at all). The UCL vic leverages encryption from the common
> > library for rijndael and AES encrypted data streams.
> >
> > How would one encrypt OM Vic streams?
> ---
>
> Ivan -
>
> Sigh, I don't think it is going to happen. I proposed doing
> that, in addition to other tasks, in the last NSF proposal I
> submitted - the one I sent to Tom Green who is head of the
> program on "Strategic Technologies for the Internet."
> Sadly, that grant was also rejected.
> Yeap, we went 0-for-3 on proposal submissions. I haven't made
> a completely public announcement of this rejection yet,
> although I did communicate it to selected people. I have
> attached a copy of the reviews from the panel. The four reviews were:
> Very Good, Good, Good, Very Good/Good
> and the panel judgement was that the proposal was
> competitive. However, the grant was not funded. Frankly,
> looking at the reviews it is pretty apparent we asked for too
> much money and people do not seem to understand the problems
> building and deliverying practical software.
> Comments like "where is the fundamental research component"
> reflect a desire for more speculative proposals that may or
> may not produce deliverable code. I structured the proposal
> to address problems that we know how to solve but require
> development and engineering and I submitted it to the ANIR
> STI program because I was told they focussed on deliverying
> working systems. Unfortunately, the proposal was not good enough.
>
> Consequently, I am closing the Open Mash research project and
> leaving Berkeley and academia. I have been layed off students
> and staff and I am in the process of closing down the
> research activities in anticipation of leaving at the end of
> this academic year. I am not exactly sure what I will do
> next, although some interesting possibilities exist. The
> bottom line is that since I do not have to work I would
> rather retire and work on projects myself than continue
> dealing with resource and political issues at Berkeley when
> there is no funding for research activities.
>
> We are finishing projects that were previously funded and in
> process - specifically implementing the h.263 decoder (we
> hoped to do the encoder next, but...), updating OM vic to
> support the UCL conference bus abstractions, and finishing
> the Mac port. I was hoping we would get something done this
> month, but it hasn't happened for a combination of reasons -
> including the time required for me to teach the very large
> introductory CS class I am doing this semester (400 plus people).
>
> So, the answer to the question "How would one encrypt OM Vic streams?"
> is: 1) find someone to fund the work, 2) find someone to do
> the work, and 3) find someone to supervise the project.
>
> I still believe these systems are too complex to use and
> require too many people to operate. The technology we
> proposed - automating the production/direction using a
> rules-based distributed systems is the right approach to
> solving the problem. Unfortunately, we could not convince
> others in the research community that the research and
> development was important enough to be funded.
> Larry
> --
> Professor Lawrence A. Rowe Internet: Rowe at BMRC.Berkeley.EDU
> Computer Science Division - EECS Phone: 510-642-5117
> University of California, Berkeley Fax: 510-642-5615
> Berkeley, CA 94720-1776 URL:
> http://bmrc.berkeley.edu/~larry
>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: sti-reviews.txt
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/ag-dev/attachments/20020927/c26f90ca/attachment.txt>
More information about the ag-dev
mailing list