CVS stuff for AG

[Robert Olson]

ah, if it's a well-defined divisional cvs server cvs.mcs makes sense.

At 08:51 AM 10/24/2002 -0500, Ivan R. Judson wrote:

>This looks good. I'm wary of the cname stuff a bit, after all this is
>the division wide anonymous cvs server, perhaps we should just publish
>cvs.mcs.anl.gov as the host, module AG. (Which feels better when I
>consider Voyager would be at the same host, just module voyager -- it
>feels cleaner somehow).
>
>Not a big deal; UCL changed the host for their cvs every few months and
>you had to look it up on the web page -- not ideal, but it worked.
>
>--Ivan
>
>..........
>Ivan R. Judson .~. http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~judson
>Futures Laboratory .~.  630 252 0920
>Argonne National Laboratory .~. 630 252 6424 Fax
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Justin Binns [mailto:binns at mcs.anl.gov]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 10:39 AM
> > To: Ivan R. Judson
> > Cc: 'Robert Olson'; papka at mcs.anl.gov; 'Ag-Dev at Mcs. Anl. Gov'
> > Subject: RE: CVS stuff for AG
> >
> >
> > I've made a few changes, along the lines below...
> >
> > The machine has a cname of ag-cvs.mcs.anl.gov
> >
> > The repository is soft-linked to '/cvsroot', and only that
> > softlink is acceptible for pserver
> >
> > The module for the source is, as Ivan suggestes, 'AG' with a
> > tag of AG_<major>_<minor> for the version (currently, just
> > one, AG_1_2 for AG 1.2).
> >
> > To summarize:
> >
> > The pserver (read-only) access to the repository is available
> > by the following command:
> >
> > cvs -d :pserver:anonymous at ag-cvs.mcs.anl.gov:/cvsroot co <module>
> >
> > The modules are:
> >
> > 'AG'      AG source code.  Tagged revision 'AG_1_2' has the 1.2 source
> > 'ag-dep'  AG dependency tarballs - ag-linux-dep.tgz and
> > ag-windows-dep.tgz 'ag-vic'  UCL VIC with all patches and
> > such, as currently distributed with
> >         the AG binary distributions
> >
> > Any other thoughts/suggestions?
> >
> > Justin
> >
> > On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Ivan R. Judson wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > is it going to stay in a sandbox directory? maybe also
> > > > advertise via a
> > > > cname - ag-cvs.mcs.anl.gov or something.
> > >
> > > I don't know what you mean by sandbox, but the plan is to use
> > > pachelbel.mcs.anl.gov and enable anonymous cvs on the AG modules.
> > >
> > > > are there notes on local access? can we restrict anonymous
> > > > access from
> > > > certain modules, or are we going to be able to just make it
> > > > all accessible
> > > > (my vote...).
> > >
> > > We'll be making it all accessible, but there will be a
> > review process
> > > for code that is being proposed to be committed. We'll have to be
> > > extremely careful about not putting broken stuff in -- this process
> > > allows external developers and internal developers to submit
> > > modifications/additions in a symmetric way, which is good for
> > > community vibe.
> > >
> > > > I worry a bit about the ag-src name - that's the source of
> > > > one version of
> > > > ag software, but as we add more it might not make sense
> > > > (hence the name I
> > > > used for the SF module).
> > >
> > > I think the module name should be AG, 1.0 should be put in with the
> > > 1.0 tag, and when we're ready we'll make a 2.0 branch (then
> > we can do
> > > bug fixes to 1.0 and still move ahead on 2.0).
> > >
> > > I think that makes sense, but I was up til 3:30 with
> > Isaiah, you never
> > > know :-) --Ivan
> > >
> > > > --bob
> > > >
> > > > At 01:16 PM 10/21/2002 -0500, Michael E. Papka wrote:
> > > > >The future distribution of AG software will be via
> > anonymous cvs at
> > > > >ANL, we are moving off the sourceforge site (discussed
> > many times no
> > > > >need to be rediscussed here). Justin and Tom have tested
> > this and we
> > > > >think its ready to go, Ivan will be sending mail to ag-tech
> > > > announcing
> > > > >this, along with directions. Justin and Ivan turn these
> > > > >instructions
> > > > >into a web page that can be put on the AG site.
> > > > >
> > > > >Mike
> > > > >
> > > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > > >From: Justin Binns [mailto:binns at mcs.anl.gov]
> > > > >Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 4:50 PM
> > > > >To: Michael E. Papka
> > > > >Subject: CVS stuff for AG
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >The CVS_ROOT is:
> > > > >
> > > > >:pserver:anonymous at pachelbel.mcs.anl.gov:/sandbox/cvs
> > > > >
> > > > >The password is blank.
> > > > >
> > > > >The relevant modules are:
> > > > >
> > > > >ag-src - the AG java sources and the helper apps.  This
> > is what was
> > > > >'agib-1-glue' in the sourceforge repository.
> > > > >
> > > > >ag-dep - this contains two tarballs that have the linux
> > and windows
> > > > >dependencies for building AG stuff.  notably, the
> > > > ag-linux-dep tarball
> > > > >contains an entire tree suitable for building ag-src - with that
> > > > >tarball and the ag-src module, you can build the ag jar file
> > > > and helper
> > > > >apps from scratch.  NOTE: this also contains the source
> > > > distribution of
> > > > >the Orbacus stuff, for license compliance (at least on *some*
> > > > >level)
> > > > >
> > > > >ag-vic - the AG 'patched' version of UCL vic - a copy of the
> > > > 'ag-vic'
> > > > >module in the sourceforge CVS repo.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >One note: the reason the dependencies are dealt with as
> > tarballs is
> > > > >that CVS, for some undetermined reason, was corrupting
> > > > certain of the
> > > > >.jar files when I tried to directly check in the tree.  If we can
> > > > >figure out why, then we can probably make it cleaner and
> > > > distribute the
> > > > >dependencies as fully expanded modules instead of tarballs, but
> > > > >this
> > > > >method works whereas the other is currently broken.  As these
> > > > >dependencies are not likely to change much, and are
> > > > basically binaries,
> > > > >I didn't think it was a big deal to do it this way.
> > > > >
> > > > >Questions/comments welcome.
> > > > >
> > > > >Justin
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >