types

[Robert Olson]

At 11:27 PM 12/10/2002 -0600, Ivan R. Judson wrote:
>In the types you've defined below, what's struct look like?

It's something in the flavor of a section5 struct, or a python dict. Basic 
purpose is to be a vehicle for extending descriptions with data not 
previously anticipated.

>This looks like it matches the content I expected to see?

Eh?


>--Ivan
>
>PS - Is this notation something I should have seen before and have forgotten
>or is it something you've defined for conversational clarity?

I made it up for the purpose of discussion.

--bob