AG 2?

[Thomas Uram]

Meanwhile, I'd like to look at the "notes you have there"?  Where is 
"there"?

Tom



Rick Stevens wrote:

>bob, I think we need to have you present to the group what you are
>thinking and then determine if we can make some decisions on proceeding.
>
>On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Robert Olson wrote:
>
>  
>
>>At 10:03 AM 8/15/2002 -0500, Michael E. Papka wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>Again reiterating my problem with it is, what if we don't follow your
>>>thoughts and/or plans? Have we misled folks in the community?
>>>      
>>>
>>I don't think so. I'm not calling them the final word, or specifications, 
>>or draft specifications.
>>
>>I'll just tell him we don't have anything yet and await consensus on the 
>>documents.
>>
>>I'd be interested in feedback on the notes I have there, btw. I've not 
>>heard anything. They contain a lot of my thoughts on how the services stuff 
>>is being put together. My process lately has been to carefully describe the 
>>problem and the proposed solution there, then to implement to match those 
>>descriptions. Part of the intent is that these notes can be turned into 
>>working documents on the project at some point.
>>
>>--bob
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/ag-dev/attachments/20020815/574ea0ac/attachment.htm>