Fwd: AG 2?

[Rick Stevens]

Bob,

I think we  want to find a way to have folks get involved in the discusion
without exposing them to very preliminary ideas.  I suggest putting things
into PPT and small note doucments.. for discussion, but keep that
separeate from the architecture and specificaitons documents that reflect
the consensus on what we *are* going to do.  I.e. separate the issues
discussions from the decisions.

On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Robert Olson wrote:

> This is a reason I'd like to give outside folks the ability to look at my 
> ag thoughts on the website. any objects to opening them up to him?
> 
> --bob
> 
> >Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:20:27 +0100
> >From: Chris Greenhalgh <cmg at Cs.Nott.AC.UK>
> >User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.2) 
> >Gecko/20010628
> >X-Accept-Language: en-us
> >To: olson at mcs.anl.gov
> >CC: cmg at Cs.Nott.AC.UK
> >Subject: AG 2?
> >X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=SUBJ_ENDS_IN_Q_MARK 
> >version=2.21
> >X-Spam-Level:
> >
> >Hi Bob,
> >I was at GGF & WACE and Rick suggested that you might be able to send me 
> >(pointer(s) to) (a) current docs/thoughts /plans on AGv2 & (b) 
> >source/cvs/whatever for the AG s/w
> >Cheers,
> >Chris
> >
> 
>