Here are my comments

[Justin Binns]

Here's my comments.  There aren't very many in the document - mostly I
agree with the comments Ivan made (this doc has both).  My primary concern
is that there is a lot of emphasis on everything being a service, and not
a lot of concrete specificity as for what these services are or
do.  Everything as a service is fine, but it's not meaningful for any
architecture unless there are some concrete service requirements.  Like
Ivan suggests, if we think of a Venue as a service, that's fine, but we
should specify what a Venue service is and does, in absolute terms, so it
becomes a "thing".

All in all, though, it's a great step forward ;-)

Justin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: VARCH-V2.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 413696 bytes
Desc: 
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/ag-dev/attachments/20020809/296dce86/attachment.doc>