[petsc-users] Any reason for API change: DMGetWorkArray()
Fande Kong
fdkong.jd at gmail.com
Thu Jan 10 17:07:22 CST 2019
OK...,
Thanks for the words.
Fande,
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 3:36 PM Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:31 PM Fande Kong <fdkong.jd at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Matt,
>>
>> And then what is the reason to remove PetscDataType? I am out of
>> curiosity.
>>
>
> Occam's Razor: "one should not increase, beyond what is necessary, the
> number of entities required to explain anything"
>
> Matt
>
>
>> DMGetWorkArray is a little misleading. This may/might make people think
>> the routine is related to MPI, but it does not have anything to do with MPI.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Fande,
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 3:22 PM Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We are trying to eliminate PetscDataType.
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:10 PM Fande Kong via petsc-users <
>>> petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> The second parameter is changed from PetscDataType to MPI_Datatype
>>>> starting from PETSc-3.9.x
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Fande Kong,
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>>> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
>>> experiments lead.
>>> -- Norbert Wiener
>>>
>>> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
>>> <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
>
> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
> <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20190110/2c65d072/attachment.html>
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list