[petsc-users] Using the PCASM interface to define minimally overlapping subdomains
Barry Smith
bsmith at mcs.anl.gov
Tue Sep 16 14:43:16 CDT 2014
On Sep 16, 2014, at 2:29 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>
> Patrick,
>
> This "local part of the subdomains for this processor” term in PCASMSetLocalSubdomains is, IMHO, extremely confusing. WTHWTS? Anyways, I think that if you set the is_local[] to be different than the is[] you will always end up with a nonsymetric preconditioner. I think for one dimension you need to use
>
> No I don't think that is right. The problem below is that you have overlap in only one direction. Process 0 overlaps
> Process 1, but Process 1 has no overlap of Process 0. This is not how Schwarz is generally envisioned.
Sure it is.
>
> Imagine the linear algebra viewpoint, which I think is cleaner here. You partition the matrix rows into non-overlapping
> sets. These sets are is_local[]. Then any information you get from another domain is another row, which is put into
> is[]. You can certainly have a non-symmetric overlap, which you have below, but it mean one way information
> transmission which is strange for convergence.
No, not a all.
| 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 |
Domain 0 is the region from | to 4 with Dirichlet boundary conditions at each end (| and 4). Domain 1 is from 2 to | with Dirichlet boundary conditions at each end (2 and |) .
If you look at the PCSetUp_ASM() and PCApply_ASM() you’ll see all kinds of VecScatter creations from the various is and is_local, “restriction”, “prolongation” and “localization” then in the apply the different scatters are applied in the two directions, which results in a non-symmetric operator.
Barry
>
> Matt
>
>
> > is[0] <-- 0 1 2 3
> > is[1] <-- 3 4 5 6
> > is_local[0] <-- 0 1 2 3
> > is_local[1] <-- 3 4 5 6
>
> Or you can pass NULL for is_local use PCASMSetOverlap(pc,0);
>
> Barry
>
>
> Note that is_local[] doesn’t have to be non-overlapping or anything.
>
>
> On Sep 16, 2014, at 10:48 AM, Patrick Sanan <patrick.sanan at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > For the purposes of reproducing an example from a paper, I'd like to use PCASM with subdomains which 'overlap minimally' (though this is probably never a good idea in practice).
> >
> > In one dimension with 7 unknowns and 2 domains, this might look like
> >
> > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 (unknowns)
> > ------------ (first subdomain : 0 .. 3)
> > ----------- (second subdomain : 3 .. 6)
> >
> > The subdomains share only a single grid point, which differs from the way PCASM is used in most of the examples.
> >
> > In two dimensions, minimally overlapping rectangular subdomains would overlap one exactly one row or column of the grid. Thus, for example, if the grid unknowns were
> >
> > 0 1 2 3 4 5 |
> > 6 7 8 9 10 11 | |
> > 12 13 14 15 16 17 |
> > --------
> > -----------
> >
> > then one minimally-overlapping set of 4 subdomains would be
> > 0 1 2 3 6 7 8 9
> > 3 4 5 9 10 11
> > 6 7 8 9 12 13 14 15
> > 9 10 11 15 16 17
> > as suggested by the dashes and pipes above. The subdomains only overlap by a single row or column of the grid.
> >
> > My question is whether and how one can use the PCASM interface to work with these sorts of decompositions (It's fine for my purposes to use a single MPI process). In particular, I don't quite understand if should be possible to define these decompositions by correctly providing is and is_local arguments to PCASMSetLocalSubdomains.
> >
> > I have gotten code to run defining the is_local entries to be subsets of the is entries which define a partition of the global degrees of freedom*, but I'm not certain that this was the correct choice, as it appears to produce an unsymmetric preconditioner for a symmetric system when I use direct subdomain solves and the 'basic' type for PCASM.
> >
> > * For example, in the 1D example above this would correspond to
> > is[0] <-- 0 1 2 3
> > is[1] <-- 3 4 5 6
> > is_local[0] <-- 0 1 2
> > is_local[1] <-- 3 4 5 6
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list