[petsc-users] Intel Internal compiler error: segmentation violation signal raised

[Matthew Knepley]

On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:26 AM, TAY wee-beng <zonexo at gmail.com> wrote:

>  On 8/4/2014 7:58 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>
>  On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 6:46 PM, TAY wee-beng <zonexo at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>  On 8/4/2014 12:40 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>>
>> How about just including petsc.h90 so you get everything.
>>
>>    Thanks,
>>
>>       Matt
>>
>>  Sorry this is my 2nd email. See below for the 1st email. Using
>> petsc.h90 gave the error "... segmentation violation signal raised ....
>>
>
>  Right, the solution there is not to use a buggy compiler. I suggest gcc.
> It is also faster for a lot of code than Intel.
>
>
> My impression was intel is mostly faster. However, does it apply to
> gfortran too? Is it also faster for a lot of code than Intel fortran? I'll
> give it a go if it's so. However, I remember changing a no. of options to
> build and in the end, it was slower. that's a few yrs ago though.
>

Anything is faster than a seg-faulting compiler. However, we have just run
a number of tests in which
gcc was faster.

   Matt


>      Matt
>
>
>>   On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 5:19 AM, TAY wee-beng <zonexo at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>  Sorry I realised that
>>>
>>> *#include "finclude/petscdmda.h90"*
>>> *#include "finclude/petscksp.h90"*
>>>
>>> also gave errors:
>>>
>>> */home/wtay/Lib/petsc-3.4.4_shared_rel/include/finclude/ftn-custom/petscdmda.h90(10):
>>> error #5082: Syntax error, found ',' when expecting one of: ( % [ : . = =>*
>>> *          PetscInt, pointer :: array(:)*
>>> *------------------^*
>>> */home/wtay/Lib/petsc-3.4.4_shared_rel/include/finclude/ftn-custom/petscdmda.h90(10):
>>> error #5082: Syntax error, found END-OF-STATEMENT when expecting one of: )
>>> ,*
>>> *          PetscInt, pointer :: array(:)*
>>> *---------------------------------------^*
>>> */home/wtay/Lib/petsc-3.4.4_shared_rel/include/finclude/ftn-custom/petscdmda.h90(11):
>>> error #5082: Syntax error, found IDENTIFIER 'N' when expecting one of: ( %
>>> [ : . = =>*
>>> *          PetscInt  n*
>>> *--------------------^*
>>> */home/wtay/Lib/petsc-3.4.4_shared_rel/include/finclude/ftn-custom/petscdmda.h90(12):
>>> error #5082: Syntax error, found IDENTIFIER 'IERR' when expecting one of: (
>>> % [ : . = =>*
>>> *          PetscErrorCode ierr*
>>> *-------------------------^*
>>> */home/wtay/Lib/petsc-3.4.4_shared_rel/include/finclude/ftn-custom/petscdmda.h90(13):
>>> error #5082: Syntax error, found IDENTIFIER 'V' when expecting one of: ( %
>>> [ : . = =>*
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>>
>>> Yours sincerely,
>>>
>>> TAY wee-beng
>>>
>>>   On 7/4/2014 6:16 PM, TAY wee-beng wrote:
>>>
>>
>> Here's the 1st email:
>>
>>        Hi,
>>>
>>> I encountered the error below when compiling my code using intel fortran:
>>>
>>> /tmp/ifortlPEDlK.i90: catastrophic error: **Internal compiler error:
>>> segmentation violation signal raised** Please report this error along with
>>> the circumstances in which it occurred in a Software Problem Report.  Note:
>>> File and line given may not be explicit cause of this error.
>>>
>>> In the end, I realised that it is due to using *petsc.h90*:
>>>
>>> module PETSc_solvers
>>>
>>> use set_matrix
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> implicit none
>>>
>>> contains
>>>
>>> subroutine semi_momentum_simple_xyz(du,dv,dw)
>>>
>>> *#include "finclude/petsc.h90"*
>>>
>>> integer :: i,j,k,ijk,ierr,II !,ro...
>>>
>>> If I use :
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *#include "finclude/petsc.h" or *
>>> *#include "finclude/petscdmda.h90"*
>>> *#include "finclude/petscksp.h90"*
>>>
>>> Then there is no problem.
>>>
>>> May I know why this is happening?
>>>
>>> Although I can now compile and build successfully, is this the right way
>>> to go?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thank you
>>>
>>> Yours sincerely,
>>>
>>> TAY wee-beng
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>  --
>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
>> experiments lead.
>> -- Norbert Wiener
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>  --
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> experiments lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
>
>
>


-- 
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20140408/50d1be46/attachment-0001.html>