[petsc-users] Fwd: Re: Problem with fortran version of ex29 in ksp
TAY wee-beng
zonexo at gmail.com
Fri May 4 14:13:00 CDT 2012
On 4/5/2012 9:09 PM, John Mousel wrote:
> You have to pass PETSC_NULL_OBJECT instead of PETSC_NULL in Fortran.
>
>
> From the man pages:
>
> "This macro does not exist in Fortran; you must use
> PETSC_NULL_INTEGER, PETSC_NULL_DOUBLE_PRECISION, PETSC_NULL_FUNCTION,
> PETSC_NULL_OBJECT etc "
>
>
> http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-dev/docs/manualpages/Sys/PETSC_NULL.html#PETSC_NULL
>
>
> John
>
Thanks for the suggestion, but they all didn't work.
>
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:01 PM, TAY wee-beng <zonexo at gmail.com
> <mailto:zonexo at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> On 4/5/2012 5:17 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:05 AM, TAY wee-beng <zonexo at gmail.com
>> <mailto:zonexo at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 4/5/2012 3:05 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:59 AM, TAY wee-beng
>>> <zonexo at gmail.com <mailto:zonexo at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Is there anything else I can try to get it working right?
>>>
>>>
>>> The MatGetNullSpaceRemove() is missing.
>> Where should I add MatGetNullSpaceRemove and what are its
>> syntax? I googled but there's no results.
>>
>>
>> Fixed in p;etsc-dev:
>>
>> http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-dev/docs/manualpages/Mat/MatNullSpaceRemove.html
>
> I just compiled the updated petsc-dev but I got the same error msg
> when I use:
>
> call MatNullSpaceRemove(nullspace,b,PETSC_NULL,ierr)
>
> error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol MATNULLSPACEREMOVE
> referenced in function COMPUTERHS
> 1>c:\obj_tmp\ex29f\Debug\ex29f.exe : fatal error LNK1120: 1
> unresolved externals
>
>>
>>
>> Matt
>>
>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> Matt
>>>
>>> Thanks！
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/5/2012 10:11 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>>>> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:55 PM, TAY wee-beng
>>>> <zonexo at gmail.com <mailto:zonexo at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I did a MatView and VecView on both C and Fortran,
>>>> right after Mat and Vec assembly. I have attached
>>>> the printout below. They are exactly the same, but
>>>> yet the result is different in Neumann condition.
>>>> However, the dirichlet condition gives the correct
>>>> ans. Is there anything else that could be wrong
>>>> even if the Mat and Vec are the same?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Did you set the null space for the matrix when you have
>>>> Neumann conditions?
>>> Yes, for the matrix, I set as:
>>>
>>> call
>>> MatNullSpaceCreate(PETSC_COMM_WORLD,PETSC_TRUE,0,PETSC_NULL_OBJECT,nullspace,ierr)
>>>
>>> call MatSetNullSpace(jac,nullspace,ierr)
>>>
>>> call MatNullSpaceDestroy(nullspace,ierr)
>>>
>>> for the Vec,
>>>
>>> call
>>> MatNullSpaceCreate(PETSC_COMM_WORLD,PETSC_TRUE,0,PETSC_NULL_OBJECT,nullspace,ierr)
>>>
>>> *!call MatNullSpaceRemove(nullspace,b,PETSC_NULL,ierr)*
>>>
>>> call MatNullSpaceDestroy(nullspace,ierr)
>>>
>>> MatNullSpaceRemove was comment out because there's error
>>> during linking
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Matt
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> Fortran:
>>>>
>>>> Matrix Object: 1 MPI processes
>>>> type: seqaij
>>>> row 0: (0, 2) (1, -1) (3, -1)
>>>> row 1: (0, -1) (1, 3) (2, -1) (4, -1)
>>>> row 2: (1, -1) (2, 2) (5, -1)
>>>> row 3: (0, -1) (3, 3) (4, -1) (6, -1)
>>>> row 4: (1, -1) (3, -1) (4, 4) (5, -1) (7, -1)
>>>> row 5: (2, -1) (4, -1) (5, 3) (8, -1)
>>>> row 6: (3, -1) (6, 2) (7, -1)
>>>> row 7: (4, -1) (6, -1) (7, 3) (8, -1)
>>>> row 8: (5, -1) (7, -1) (8, 2)
>>>> Vector Object:Vec_0000000084000000_0 1 MPI processes
>>>> type: mpi
>>>> Process [0]
>>>> 0.25
>>>> 0.0205213
>>>> 1.135e-005
>>>> 0.0205213
>>>> 0.00168449
>>>> 9.31663e-007
>>>> 1.135e-005
>>>> 9.31663e-007
>>>> 5.15289e-010
>>>> Vector Object:Vec_0000000084000000_1 1 MPI processes
>>>> type: mpi
>>>> Process [0]
>>>> 0.14924
>>>> 0.0242397
>>>> -0.0260347
>>>> 0.0242397
>>>> -0.0256192
>>>> -0.0400102
>>>> -0.0260347
>>>> -0.0400102
>>>> -0.0400102
>>>> Press any key to continue . . .
>>>>
>>>> C:
>>>>
>>>> Matrix Object: 1 MPI processes
>>>> type: seqaij
>>>> row 0: (0, 2) (1, -1) (3, -1)
>>>> row 1: (0, -1) (1, 3) (2, -1) (4, -1)
>>>> row 2: (1, -1) (2, 2) (5, -1)
>>>> row 3: (0, -1) (3, 3) (4, -1) (6, -1)
>>>> row 4: (1, -1) (3, -1) (4, 4) (5, -1) (7, -1)
>>>> row 5: (2, -1) (4, -1) (5, 3) (8, -1)
>>>> row 6: (3, -1) (6, 2) (7, -1)
>>>> row 7: (4, -1) (6, -1) (7, 3) (8, -1)
>>>> row 8: (5, -1) (7, -1) (8, 2)
>>>> Vector Object:Vec_0x1d3b000_0 1 MPI processes
>>>> type: mpi
>>>> Process [0]
>>>> 0.25
>>>> 0.0205212
>>>> 1.135e-05
>>>> 0.0205212
>>>> 0.00168449
>>>> 9.31663e-07
>>>> 1.135e-05
>>>> 9.31663e-07
>>>> 5.15288e-10
>>>> Vector Object:Vec_0x1d3b000_1 1 MPI processes
>>>> type: mpi
>>>> Process [0]
>>>> 0.139311
>>>> 0.0305751
>>>> -0.0220633
>>>> 0.0305751
>>>> -0.0135158
>>>> -0.042185
>>>> -0.0220633
>>>> -0.042185
>>>> -0.058449
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yours sincerely,
>>>>
>>>> TAY wee-beng
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 1/5/2012 11:54 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:48 PM, TAY wee-beng
>>>>> <zonexo at gmail.com <mailto:zonexo at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you mean my method is wrong?
>>>>>
>>>>> I am following the template of ex22f,
>>>>>
>>>>> where the variables are declared as :
>>>>>
>>>>> PetscScalar v(5)
>>>>>
>>>>> MatStencil row(4),col(4,5)
>>>>>
>>>>> Hence,
>>>>>
>>>>> for the neumann BC
>>>>>
>>>>> num = 1
>>>>>
>>>>> if (j/=0) then
>>>>>
>>>>> v(num) = -rho*HxdHy
>>>>>
>>>>> col(MatStencil_i,num) = i
>>>>>
>>>>> col(MatStencil_j,num) = j-1
>>>>>
>>>>> num = num + 1
>>>>>
>>>>> end if
>>>>>
>>>>> if (i/=0) then
>>>>>
>>>>> v(num) = -rho*HydHx
>>>>>
>>>>> col(MatStencil_i,num) = i-1
>>>>>
>>>>> col(MatStencil_j,num) = j
>>>>>
>>>>> num = num + 1
>>>>>
>>>>> end if
>>>>>
>>>>> if (i/=mx-1) then
>>>>>
>>>>> v(num) = -rho*HydHx
>>>>>
>>>>> col(MatStencil_i,num) = i+1
>>>>>
>>>>> col(MatStencil_j,num) = j
>>>>>
>>>>> num = num + 1
>>>>>
>>>>> end if
>>>>>
>>>>> if (j/=my-1) then
>>>>>
>>>>> v(num) = -rho*HxdHy
>>>>>
>>>>> col(MatStencil_i,num) = i
>>>>>
>>>>> col(MatStencil_j,num) = j+1
>>>>>
>>>>> num = num + 1
>>>>>
>>>>> end if
>>>>>
>>>>> v(num) =
>>>>> ((num-1)/2.0)*rho*(HxdHy + HydHx)
>>>>>
>>>>> print *, v
>>>>>
>>>>> col(MatStencil_i,num) = i
>>>>>
>>>>> col(MatStencil_j,num) = j
>>>>>
>>>>> !num = num + 1
>>>>>
>>>>> call
>>>>> MatSetValuesStencil(jac,i1,row,num,col,v,INSERT_VALUES,ierr)
>>>>>
>>>>> I do not get any more out of range error.
>>>>> However,my ans is still different from that of
>>>>> ex29 in C.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is very simple. You have an error in your
>>>>> code. Checking it is very simple: run the code and
>>>>> break in MatSetValues(). Make sure ex29 makes
>>>>> calls with exactly the same indices as your ex29f.
>>>>>
>>>>> Matt
>>>>>
>>>>> Yours sincerely,
>>>>>
>>>>> TAY wee-beng
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> What most experimenters take for granted before
>>>>> they begin their experiments is infinitely more
>>>>> interesting than any results to which their
>>>>> experiments lead.
>>>>> -- Norbert Wiener
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> What most experimenters take for granted before they
>>>> begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting
>>>> than any results to which their experiments lead.
>>>> -- Norbert Wiener
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin
>>> their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any
>>> results to which their experiments lead.
>>> -- Norbert Wiener
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to
>> which their experiments lead.
>> -- Norbert Wiener
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20120504/16879c44/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list