[petsc-users] compare: performance of petsc_3.3p2 and petsc_dev-r24197

[Feng Li]

Thank you for your help!
The log_summary result is in the attachment.
Please kindly check the attachment!


2012/8/22 Aron Ahmadia <aron.ahmadia at kaust.edu.sa>

> Can you re-run both codes with: -log_summary please?
>
> A
>
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Feng Li <fengshen186 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > The performance of petsc_3.3p2 is five times faster than
> petsc_dev-r24197.
> > Why?
> >
> > It is tested with pflotran example problem 100x100x100.
> > config parameter：--with-mpi=0 --CC=gcc --FC=gfortran --CCFLAGS="-g -O2"
> > --FCFLAGS="-g -O2" --blas-lapack-dir=$MKLROOT
> >
> > detail time:
> >                       petsc_3.3p2          petsc_dev24197
> > walltime(sec)        28.116                 110.25
> >
> > Thank you!
>
> --
>
> ------------------------------
> This message and its contents, including attachments are intended solely
> for the original recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or have
> received this message in error, please notify me immediately and delete
> this message from your computer system. Any unauthorized use or
> distribution is prohibited. Please consider the environment before printing
> this email.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20120822/f2e084c6/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: log_33p2
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 45416 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20120822/f2e084c6/attachment-0002.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: log_dev
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 45437 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20120822/f2e084c6/attachment-0003.obj>