[petsc-users] Petsc-3.2 with superlu_dist building error

[Xiaoye S. Li]

The error is related to the new SuperLU_DIST (v3.0), not serial SuperLU.
In PETSc / SuperLU_DIST wrapper:  superlu_dist.c, line 634,  DOUBLE
should be replaced by SLU_DOUBLE.

Sherry


On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 12:34, Ping Rong <ping.rong at tuhh.de> wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I was trying to compile the PETSc-3.2-p4 with superlu_dist. The machine is
>> running with Ubuntu 10.04, gcc 4.4.5 and cmake 2.8.5. the configuration
>> looks like the following:
>> ./config/configure.py \
>> --with-precision=double \
>> --with-blas-lib=$LIBS_DIR/lapack/lib/libblas.so \
>> --with-lapack-lib=$LIBS_DIR/lapack/lib/liblapack.so \
>> --with-scalar-type=complex \
>> --with-clanguage=c++ \
>> --with-mpi-dir=$LIBS_DIR/mpich2 \
>> --download-superlu=yes \
>> --with-superlu=1 \
>> --download-parmetis=yes \
>> --with-parmetis=1 \
>> --download-superlu_dist=yes \
>> --with-superlu_dist=1 \
>> --with-debugging=no \
>> --with-shared-libraries=1
>>
>> when I try to run "make all", it throws the error
>> //-------------------------------
>> [ 60%] Building CXX object CMakeFiles/petsc.dir/src/mat/order/amd/amd.c.o
>> /home/xxx/libs/petsc/src/mat/impls/aij/mpi/superlu_dist/superlu_dist.c: In
>> function ‘PetscErrorCode MatGetFactor_aij_superlu_dist(_p_Mat*,
>> MatFactorType, _p_Mat**)’:
>>
>> /home/xxx/libs/petsc/src/mat/impls/aij/mpi/superlu_dist/superlu_dist.c:634:
>> error: ‘DOUBLE’ was not declared in this scope
>> /home/xxx/libs/petsc/src/mat/impls/aij/mpi/superlu_dist/superlu_dist.c: In
>> function ‘PetscErrorCode MatFactorInfo_SuperLU_DIST(_p_Mat*,
>> _p_PetscViewer*)’:
>>
>> /home/xxx/libs/petsc/src/mat/impls/aij/mpi/superlu_dist/superlu_dist.c:698:
>> error: ‘DOUBLE’ was not declared in this scope
>
> The SuperLU maintainer made an API-incompatible change to the released
> tarball.
> Sherry, we talked about this last week and I thought you were going to make
> a SuperLU-4.3 release with the namespaced enum values?