SBAIJ issue
Andreas Grassl
Andreas.Grassl at student.uibk.ac.at
Tue Oct 13 05:00:55 CDT 2009
Barry Smith schrieb:
>
> Perhaps you have done enough memory preallocation for the
> multiprocessors and it is going very--very slowly with memory allocations?
do you mean this line
MatMPISBAIJSetPreallocation(A, bs,nz, PETSC_NULL,nz, PETSC_NULL)
I set bs to 1 and nz to 77
or do you mean the icntl(14) option of MUMPS? Increasing to 2000 allows to
complete the run with np=4.
on a even larger problem (~1800000 DOF) I now get by setting the icntl(23)
option to a reasonable value a full run.
So it seems it is a MUMPS-finetuning-problem!?
The problem with -ksp_view_binary is persisting.
Is it possible that MUMPS is working much faster and load balancing better if it
has a vaste amount of memory available?
Any general advices beside switching to a larger machine?
Cheers,
ando
--
/"\ Grassl Andreas
\ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign Uni Innsbruck Institut f. Mathematik
X against HTML email Technikerstr. 13 Zi 709
/ \ +43 (0)512 507 6091
More information about the petsc-users
mailing list