[petsc-dev] MATSBAIJ MatChop MAT_GETROW_UPPERTRIANGULAR
Stefano Zampini
stefano.zampini at gmail.com
Tue Apr 14 17:26:53 CDT 2020
Other basic operations (i.e. MatAXPY_Basic) handles this programmatically. You should open an MR fixing it.
> On Apr 15, 2020, at 1:22 AM, Jed Brown <jed at jedbrown.org> wrote:
>
> Jacob Faibussowitsch <jacob.fai at gmail.com <mailto:jacob.fai at gmail.com>> writes:
>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> When using MATSBAIJ and MatChop you get the following error:
>>
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: No support for this operation for this object type
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: MatGetRow is not supported for SBAIJ matrix format. Getting the upper triangular part of row, run with -mat_getrow_uppertriangular, call MatSetOption(mat,MAT_GETROW_UPPERTRIANGULAR,PETSC_TRUE) or MatGetRowUpperTriangular()
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: See https://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/documentation/faq.html for trouble shooting.
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: Petsc Development GIT revision: v3.13-108-ga86b3fd671 GIT Date: 2020-04-10 15:27:46 -0500
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: ./tightbinding on a arch-slepc-lammps named Jacobs-MacBook-Pro.local by jacobfaibussowitsch Tue Apr 14 16:57:07 2020
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: Configure options --download-slepc --with-blaslapack --with-debugging=yes --with-mpi-dir=/Users/jacobfaibussowitsch/NoSync/petscpackages PETSC_ARCH=arch-slepc-lammps
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: #1 MatGetRow_SeqSBAIJ() line 294 in /Users/jacobfaibussowitsch/NoSync/petsc/src/mat/impls/sbaij/seq/sbaij.c
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: #2 MatGetRow() line 563 in /Users/jacobfaibussowitsch/NoSync/petsc/src/mat/interface/matrix.c
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: #3 MatChop() line 488 in /Users/jacobfaibussowitsch/NoSync/petsc/src/mat/utils/axpy.c
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: #4 CreateHamiltonian() line 425 in /Users/jacobfaibussowitsch/NoSync/TB/tightbinding.c
>> [0]PETSC ERROR: #5 main() line 458 in /Users/jacobfaibussowitsch/NoSync/TB/tightbinding.c
>>
>> But if you follow the instructions above, i.e. running with -mat_getrow_uppertriangular true then this works without a hitch.
>>
>> Since MATSBAIJ is always symmetric and upper triangular by design, then shouldn’t this MatOption be enabled by default? Or maybe MatChop should check MatType and use the correct MatGetRow impls.
>
> MatChop should handle it, but MatGetRow() needs to get the whole row (or fail, as in this case), otherwise many algorithms will break in confusing ways when someone lobs in -dm_mat_type sbaij.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20200415/66a79c10/attachment.html>
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list