[petsc-dev] failed rebase
Mark Adams
mfadams at lbl.gov
Thu Apr 2 21:45:04 CDT 2020
On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 10:33 PM Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> Is this branch mark/feature-xgc-interface-rebase pushed?
yes.
> I had done a build with the current state of it - and the build went
> through fine. This was on linux.
>
> Will try OSX now.
>
> Satish
>
> On Thu, 2 Apr 2020, Mark Adams wrote:
>
> > Note, when I rebased I got one conflict, in a header where I added stuff
> at
> > the end and master did also so I just kept them both and continued.
> > Other than that it was a clean rebase.
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 10:15 PM Mark Adams <mfadams at lbl.gov> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 9:32 PM Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> > >
> > >> can you try this in a local clone [same branch] and see if that works?
> > >>
> > >> cd /Users/markadams/Codes
> > >> git clone petsc petsc-test
> > >> cd petsc-test
> > >> ./configure ...
> > >>
> > >> Satish
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, 2 Apr 2020, Mark Adams wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > I tried to rebase mark/feature-xgc-interface-rebase with master and
> I
> > >> get
> > >> > this.
> > >> > I of course deleted the arch directory.
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> > Mark
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20200402/c820f4ff/attachment.html>
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list