[petsc-dev] broken stuff in next for many days

[Smith, Barry F.]

> On Apr 21, 2018, at 6:38 PM, Balay, Satish <balay at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 21 Apr 2018, Václav Hapla wrote:
> 
>> Sorry Barry, that's my fault.
>> 
>> Thanks a lot Satish for the quick fix with !trilinos. Hope it works now.
>> 
>> I think the chaco partitioner should be definitely replaced by simple it these tests as Matt suggested. But I will rather push it within a separate PR since it extends the tested archs (by removing chaco and !trilinos requirements) so some previously unseen issues might appear theoretically.
> 
> Yes - any changes should be a new PR.
> 
> It would be good to figure out exactly where the difference comes form
> [wrt chaco from trilinos vs separate install of chaco - or some other
> interaction from trilinos]

   Different random numbers being generated?
> 
> and we could keep chaco tests - and tailor them appropriately with
> '!trilinos' or have multipe outout file [i.e _alt.out format] for
> chaco tests - if thats appropriate.

   If both sets are correct than an _alt file is better than !trilinos in the long run.

    Barry


> 
> Satish