[petsc-dev] Seeming performance regression with GAMG
Lawrence Mitchell
lawrence.mitchell at imperial.ac.uk
Mon Apr 27 10:12:40 CDT 2015
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 27/04/15 16:06, Lawrence Mitchell wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> we recently noticed a slowdown when using GAMG that I'm trying to
> track down in a little more detail. I'm solving an Hdiv-L2
> "helmholtz" pressure correction using a schur complement. I
> precondition the schur complement with 'selfp', which morally looks
> like a normal Helmholtz operator (except in the DG space). The domain
> is very anisotropic (a thin atmospheric shell), so getting round to
> trying Toby's column-based coarsening plugin is on the horizon but I
> haven't done it yet.
>
> I don't have a good feel for exactly when things go worse, but here
> are two data points:
>
> A recentish master (e4b003c), and master from 26th Feb (30ab49e4). I
> notice in the former that MatPtAP takes significantly longer (full
> logs below), different coarsening maybe? As a point of comparison,
> the PCSetup for Hypre takes ballpark half a second on the same operator.
>
> I test with KSP ex6 (with a constant RHS):
>
> Any ideas?
I should have mentioned, a MatLoadable matrix is available at:
http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~lmitche1/
Lawrence
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVPlHkAAoJECOc1kQ8PEYvDAoH/0bN3QpIyel3SekcMa/M63EN
5k37bPfkFWj+B49bUEwvB1f3+GhakFLYQieVnsLWHoLsGjDIZo7AgmrUIJZkR0gx
HoKcyh3NnSkw4nzsi91FQC3zqhBVJ1Vcyugmlp+xtT86CKRb69w+vHlzS7/onabv
j+4cXw2ZXGUKB3xrG4ka2QKP4wudfIk2ZmrN++2G//tzhPjM00Wwn9fNb5b8LFtW
dzj8u06dt9HjSzxem0sUYLCrWNSUGM1FNGEr8uuNlttE8qf4lCAlWLupx8ywfcnH
g0twzTnvgQTqfLfvQFnQVL30F5i0D1BlTscTn6jlenOGx4pwe7Hjuqym+dIK4tE=
=41dp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list