[petsc-dev] failed nightly
    William Gropp 
    wgropp at illinois.edu
       
    Fri Apr 10 13:20:10 CDT 2015
    
    
  
You are 100% correct.
Unfortunately, there is a school of thought that believes otherwise.  They’re terribly wrong, but they are also vocal :(
Bill
On Apr 10, 2015, at 1:06 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> Not testing something that doesn't work in order to not have an error in the tests doesn't seem right to me. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20150410/7f97c6ee/attachment.html>
    
    
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list