[petsc-dev] migrating repos from petsc.cs.iit.edu to bitbucket.org
Jed Brown
jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov
Sat Nov 17 10:52:44 CST 2012
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> This presumably merged the new head [in petsc-release/buildsystem]
> that I created with the new head that Barry created in his clone?
>
> BTW: am I correct in assuming that this head won't get pushed to
> buildsystem unless 'petsc-release -> petsc-dev -> push to bitbucket'
> process is completed? So in that intermediate time - petsc-release
> will point to a non-existant buildsystem state?
>
> Or will a push of petsc-release won't succeed until the above
> 'petsc-release -> petsc-dev -> push to bitbucket' process is
> completed?
>
I think it won't succeed, but would have to check.
> > > [error with buildsystem push - so merge with petsc-release, push]
> > >
> >
> > Right, go to petsc-dev, pull petsc-release, merge (applies to both
> > petsc-dev and petsc-dev/buildsystem), and push.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > BTW: from http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/Subrepository
> > >
> > > * There's no support for merging across renaming/moving subrepos *
> > >
> > > So changing 'BuildSystem -> 'buildsystem' will cause grief with
> subrepos?
> > >
> >
> > I think we should do the rename first.
>
> Then we should perhaps wait till the next release [just before the
> release - when no more patches will be merged from petsc-3.3 to
> petsc-dev] before making these changes?
>
> [I don't think its appropriate to make this change for a petsc-3.3 patch
> update.]
>
Okay, what if we start using subrepos with petsc-dev -> buildsystem and let
petsc-release continue to depend on a buildsystem-release without use of
subrepo?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20121117/351dd19f/attachment.html>
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list