[petsc-dev] Non-scalable matrix operations
Jed Brown
jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov
Fri Dec 23 11:02:39 CST 2011
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:48, Mark F. Adams <mark.adams at columbia.edu>wrote:
> There is the implementation in Prometheus that uses my C++ linked lists
> and hash tables. I would like to implement this with STLs. I also hack
> into MPIAIJ matrices to provide a primitive of applying G-S on an index set
> of local vertices, required for the algorithm. This should be rethought.
> I would guess that it would take about a week or two to move this into
> PETSc.
>
> The complex communication required make this code work much better with
> large subdomains, so it is getting less attractive in a flat MPI mode, as
> it is currently written. If I do this I would like to think about doing it
> in the next programming model of PETSc (pthreads?). Anyway, this would
> take enough work that I'd like to think a bit about its design and even the
> algorithm in a non flat MPI model.
>
> Note, I see the win with G-S over Cheby in highly unsymmetric (convection,
> hyperbolic) problems where Cheby is not very good.
>
Can we mix with Eisenstat to apply multiple cycles? I know the theory
doesn't argue for it, but G-S with Cheby sometimes wins over everything
else I've tried. Is there any hope of doing nonlinear G-S where the user
can provide something moderately simple?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20111223/eca72b8d/attachment.html>
More information about the petsc-dev
mailing list