<html><head></head><body>Thanks for the clarification.<div>However, would it be more consistent to differentiate between 0D (vertex sets), 1D (edge sets), 2d (faces) and 3D (cell sets)? </div><div>If I want to now apply boundary condition on a face with tag 1, it would contain the 4 edges making up that face and an additional edge with the same physical tag? </div><div>Basically, I can’t differentiate between the two entities</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Sharan <br><div><br></div><div><b>Group - Theory & Simulation</b></div><div><b>Department of Microstructure Physics & Alloy Design</b></div><br><br><br><div><strong>
From:
</strong>
Matthew Knepley <knepley@gmail.com>
<br>
<strong>
To:
</strong>
Sharan Roongta <s.roongta@mpie.de>
<br>
<strong>
Cc:
</strong>
"petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov" <petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov>
<br>
<strong>
Sent:
</strong>
13/12/2023 12:51 AM
<br>
<strong>
Subject:
</strong>
Re: [petsc-users] difference in Face Sets in latest petsc release
<br><br><blockquote class="mcntmori" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px solid #CCC;padding-left:1ex;"><div><div>On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 5:50 PM Sharan Roongta <<a href="mailto:s.roongta@mpie.de" title="Send email to s.roongta@mpie.de" class="mailto" target="_blank">s.roongta@mpie.de</a>> wrote:<br></div><div class="mcntmcntgmail_quote"><blockquote class="mcntmcntgmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div>Hello,<div><br></div><div>I see discrepancy in the size/value of the 'Face Sets' printed in the current release v3.20.2 , and v3.18.6<br><br>Attached is the .msh file<br><br>-dm_view with v3.18.6<br><div>DM Object: Generated Mesh 1 MPI process</div><div> type: plex</div><div>Generated Mesh in 3 dimensions:</div><div> Number of 0-cells per rank: 14</div><div> Number of 1-cells per rank: 49</div><div> Number of 2-cells per rank: 60</div><div> Number of 3-cells per rank: 24</div><div>Labels:</div><div> celltype: 4 strata with value/size (0 (14), 6 (24), 3 (60), 1 (49))</div><div> depth: 4 strata with value/size (0 (14), 1 (49), 2 (60), 3 (24))</div><div> Cell Sets: 1 strata with value/size (1 (24))</div><div> Face Sets: 5 strata with value/size (1 (4), 2 (4), 3 (4), 4 (4), 5 (4))</div><br><br>-dm_view with the current release (commit 4b9a870af96)<br><br><div>DM Object: Generated Mesh 1 MPI process</div><div> type: plex</div><div>Generated Mesh in 3 dimensions:</div><div> Number of 0-cells per rank: 14</div><div> Number of 1-cells per rank: 49</div><div> Number of 2-cells per rank: 60</div><div> Number of 3-cells per rank: 24</div><div>Labels:</div><div> celltype: 4 strata with value/size (0 (14), 6 (24), 3 (60), 1 (49))</div><div> depth: 4 strata with value/size (0 (14), 1 (49), 2 (60), 3 (24))</div><div> Cell Sets: 1 strata with value/size (1 (24))</div><div> Face Sets: 12 strata with value/size (1 (5), 2 (5), 3 (5), 4 (5), 5 (5), 6 (1), 7 (1), 8 (1), 9 (1), 10 (1), 11 (1), 12 (1))</div><br>I believe the older version printed the correct thing? Has something changed in the interpretation of Face Sets?<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes. In the older version, I was only labeling cells, faces, and vertices. There were complaints, so I put in the edge labels. If you check, all the additional labels are on edges, and checking your .msh file, those edges clearly have those labels.</div><div><br></div><div> Thanks,</div><div><br></div><div> Matt</div><div> </div><blockquote class="mcntmcntgmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div><div>Thanks,<br>Sharan<br><br><div><b>Group - Theory & Simulation</b></div><div><b>Department of Microstructure Physics & Alloy Design</b></div></div><br>
<br>
<hr>
-------------------------------------------------<br>
Stay up to date and follow us on LinkedIn, Twitter and YouTube.<br>
<br>
Max-Planck-Institut für Eisenforschung GmbH<br>
Max-Planck-Straße 1<br>
D-40237 Düsseldorf<br>
<br>
Handelsregister B 2533 <br>
Amtsgericht Düsseldorf<br>
<br>
Geschäftsführung<br>
Prof. Dr. Gerhard Dehm<br>
Prof. Dr. Jörg Neugebauer<br>
Prof. Dr. Dierk Raabe<br>
Dr. Kai de Weldige<br>
<br>
Ust.-Id.-Nr.: DE <a href="tel:11 93 58 514" target="_blank">11 93 58 514</a> <br>
Steuernummer: <a href="tel:105 5891 1000" target="_blank">105 5891 1000</a><br>
<br>
<br>
Please consider that invitations and e-mails of our institute are <br>
only valid if they end with …@<a href="http://mpie.de" target="_blank">mpie.de</a>. <br>
If you are not sure of the validity please contact <a href="mailto:rco@mpie.de" target="_blank" title="Send email to rco@mpie.de" class="mailto">rco@mpie.de</a><br>
<br>
Bitte beachten Sie, dass Einladungen zu Veranstaltungen und E-Mails<br>
aus unserem Haus nur mit der Endung …@<a href="http://mpie.de" target="_blank">mpie.de</a> gültig sind. <br>
In Zweifelsfällen wenden Sie sich bitte an <a href="mailto:rco@mpie.de" target="_blank" title="Send email to rco@mpie.de" class="mailto">rco@mpie.de</a><br>
-------------------------------------------------<br>
</div></blockquote></div><br clear="all"><div><br></div><span class="mcntmcntgmail_signature_prefix">-- </span><br><div class="mcntmcntgmail_signature"><div><div><div><div><div><div>What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.<br>-- Norbert Wiener</div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/" target="_blank">https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/</a><br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div></div><BR />
<BR />
<HR />
-------------------------------------------------<BR />
Stay up to date and follow us on LinkedIn, Twitter and YouTube.<BR />
<BR />
Max-Planck-Institut für Eisenforschung GmbH<BR />
Max-Planck-Straße 1<BR />
D-40237 Düsseldorf<BR />
<BR />
Handelsregister B 2533 <BR />
Amtsgericht Düsseldorf<BR />
<BR />
Geschäftsführung<BR />
Prof. Dr. Gerhard Dehm<BR />
Prof. Dr. Jörg Neugebauer<BR />
Prof. Dr. Dierk Raabe<BR />
Dr. Kai de Weldige<BR />
<BR />
Ust.-Id.-Nr.: DE 11 93 58 514 <BR />
Steuernummer: 105 5891 1000<BR />
<BR />
<BR />
Please consider that invitations and e-mails of our institute are <BR />
only valid if they end with …@mpie.de. <BR />
If you are not sure of the validity please contact rco@mpie.de<BR />
<BR />
Bitte beachten Sie, dass Einladungen zu Veranstaltungen und E-Mails<BR />
aus unserem Haus nur mit der Endung …@mpie.de gültig sind. <BR />
In Zweifelsfällen wenden Sie sich bitte an rco@mpie.de<BR />
-------------------------------------------------<BR />
</body></html>