<div dir="ltr">Not sure if this is helpful. I did "git bisect", and here was the result:<br><br>[kongf@sawtooth2 petsc]$ git bisect bad<br>246ba74192519a5f34fb6e227d1c64364e19ce2c is the first bad commit<br>commit 246ba74192519a5f34fb6e227d1c64364e19ce2c<br>Author: Junchao Zhang <<a href="mailto:jczhang@mcs.anl.gov">jczhang@mcs.anl.gov</a>><br>Date: Wed Oct 13 05:32:43 2021 +0000<br><br> Config: fix CUDA library and header dirs<br><br>:040000 040000 187c86055adb80f53c1d0565a8888704fec43a96 ea1efd7f594fd5e8df54170bc1bc7b00f35e4d5f M config<br><br><br>Started from this commit, and GPU did not work for me on our HPC<br><br>Thanks,<br>Fande</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 7:18 PM Fande Kong <<a href="mailto:fdkong.jd@gmail.com">fdkong.jd@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 9:04 AM Jacob Faibussowitsch <<a href="mailto:jacob.fai@gmail.com" target="_blank">jacob.fai@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div>Configure should not have an impact here I think. The reason I had you run `cudaGetDeviceCount()` is because this is the CUDA call (and in fact the only CUDA call) in the initialization sequence that returns the error code. There should be no prior CUDA calls. Maybe this is a problem with oversubscribing GPU’s? In the runs that crash, how many ranks are using any given GPU at once? Maybe MPS is required.</div></blockquote><div><br>I used one MPI rank. <br><br>Fande<br><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div><div><br><div>
<div dir="auto" style="color:rgb(0,0,0);letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;text-decoration:none"><div dir="auto" style="color:rgb(0,0,0);letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;text-decoration:none"><div>Best regards,<br><br>Jacob Faibussowitsch<br>(Jacob Fai - booss - oh - vitch)<br></div></div></div>
</div>
<div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div>On Jan 21, 2022, at 12:01, Fande Kong <<a href="mailto:fdkong.jd@gmail.com" target="_blank">fdkong.jd@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br><div><div dir="ltr" style="font-family:Menlo-Regular;font-size:12px;font-style:normal;font-variant-caps:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;text-decoration:none"><div dir="ltr">Thanks Jacob,</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 6:25 PM Jacob Faibussowitsch <<a href="mailto:jacob.fai@gmail.com" target="_blank">jacob.fai@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div>Segfault is caused by the following check at src/sys/objects/device/impls/cupm/cupmdevice.cxx:349 being a PetscUnlikelyDebug() rather than just PetscUnlikely():<div><br></div><div>```</div><div>if (PetscUnlikelyDebug(_defaultDevice < 0)) { // _defaultDevice is in fact < 0 here and uncaught</div><div>```</div><div><br></div><div>To clarify: </div><div><br></div><div>“lazy” initialization is not that lazy after all, it still does some 50% of the initialization that “eager” initialization does. It stops short initializing the CUDA runtime, checking CUDA aware MPI, gathering device data, and initializing cublas and friends. Lazy also importantly swallows any errors that crop up during initialization, storing the resulting error code for later (specifically _defaultDevice = -init_error_value;).</div><div><br><div>So whether you initialize lazily or eagerly makes no difference here, as _defaultDevice will always contain -35.</div><div><br></div><div>The bigger question is why cudaGetDeviceCount() is returning cudaErrorInsufficientDriver. Can you compile and run</div><div><br></div><div>```</div><div>#include <cuda_runtime.h></div><div><br></div><div>int main()</div><div>{</div><div> <span> </span>int ndev;</div><div> <span> </span>return cudaGetDeviceCount(&ndev):</div><div>}</div><div>```</div><div><br></div><div>Then show the value of "echo $?”?</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Modify your code a little to get more information.<br><br>#include <cuda_runtime.h><br>#include <cstdio><br><br>int main()<br>{<br> int ndev;<br> int error = cudaGetDeviceCount(&ndev);<br> printf("ndev %d \n", ndev);<br> printf("error %d \n", error);<br> return 0;<br>}<br></div><div><br></div><div>Results:<br><br><div style="margin:0px;font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:11px;line-height:normal;font-family:Menlo"><span style="font-variant-ligatures:no-common-ligatures">$ ./a.out<span> </span></span></div><div style="margin:0px;font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:11px;line-height:normal;font-family:Menlo"><span style="font-variant-ligatures:no-common-ligatures">ndev 4<span> </span></span></div><div style="margin:0px;font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:11px;line-height:normal;font-family:Menlo"><span style="font-variant-ligatures:no-common-ligatures">error 0<span> </span></span></div></div><div><br><br>I have not read the PETSc cuda initialization code yet. If I need to guess at what was happening. I will naively think that PETSc did not get correct GPU information in the configuration because the compiler node does not have GPUs, and there was no way to get any GPU device information.<span> </span><br><br>During the runtime on GPU nodes, PETSc might have incorrect information grabbed during configuration and had this kind of false error message.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,<br><br>Fande</div><div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div><div><div><br><div><div><div dir="auto" style="letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;text-decoration:none"><div dir="auto" style="letter-spacing:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;text-decoration:none"><div>Best regards,<br><br>Jacob Faibussowitsch<br>(Jacob Fai - booss - oh - vitch)<br></div></div></div></div><div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div>On Jan 20, 2022, at 17:47, Matthew Knepley <<a href="mailto:knepley@gmail.com" target="_blank">knepley@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br><div><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 6:44 PM Fande Kong <<a href="mailto:fdkong.jd@gmail.com" target="_blank">fdkong.jd@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>Thanks, Jed</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 4:34 PM Jed Brown <<a href="mailto:jed@jedbrown.org" target="_blank">jed@jedbrown.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">You can't create CUDA or Kokkos Vecs if you're running on a node without a GPU.<span> </span></blockquote><div><br>I am running the code on compute nodes that do have GPUs.<br></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>If you are actually running on GPUs, why would you need lazy initialization? It would not break with GPUs present.</div><div><br></div><div> Matt</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><div>With PETSc-3.16.1, I got good speedup by running GAMG on GPUs. That might be a bug of PETSc-main.<br><br>Thanks,<br><br>Fande<br><br><br><br>KSPSetUp 13 1.0 6.4400e-01 1.0 2.02e+09 1.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 3140 64630 15 1.05e+02 5 3.49e+01 100<br>KSPSolve 1 1.0 1.0109e+00 1.0 3.49e+10 1.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0 87 0 0 0 0 87 0 0 0 34522 69556 4 4.35e-03 1 2.38e-03 100<br>KSPGMRESOrthog 142 1.0 1.2674e-01 1.0 1.06e+10 1.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0 27 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 83755 87801 0 0.00e+00 0 0.00e+00 100<br>SNESSolve 1 1.0 4.4402e+01 1.0 4.00e+10 1.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 21100 0 0 0 21100 0 0 0 901 51365 57 1.10e+03 52 8.78e+02 100<br>SNESSetUp 1 1.0 3.9101e-05 1.0 0.00e+00 0.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00e+00 0 0.00e+00 0<br>SNESFunctionEval 2 1.0 1.7097e+01 1.0 1.60e+07 1.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 8 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.00e+00 6 1.92e+02 0<br>SNESJacobianEval 1 1.0 1.6213e+01 1.0 2.80e+07 1.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 8 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0.00e+00 1 3.20e+01 0<br>SNESLineSearch 1 1.0 8.5582e+00 1.0 1.24e+08 1.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 14 64153 1 3.20e+01 3 9.61e+01 94<br>PCGAMGGraph_AGG 5 1.0 3.0509e+00 1.0 8.19e+07 1.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 27 0 5 3.49e+01 9 7.43e+01 0<br>PCGAMGCoarse_AGG 5 1.0 3.8711e+00 1.0 0.00e+00 0.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00e+00 0 0.00e+00 0<br>PCGAMGProl_AGG 5 1.0 7.0748e-01 1.0 0.00e+00 0.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00e+00 0 0.00e+00 0<br>PCGAMGPOpt_AGG 5 1.0 1.2904e+00 1.0 2.14e+09 1.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 1 5 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 1661 29807 26 7.15e+02 20 2.90e+02 99<br>GAMG: createProl 5 1.0 8.9489e+00 1.0 2.22e+09 1.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 4 6 0 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 249 29666 31 7.50e+02 29 3.64e+02 96<br> <span> </span>Graph 10 1.0 3.0478e+00 1.0 8.19e+07 1.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 27 0 5 3.49e+01 9 7.43e+01 0<br> <span> </span>MIS/Agg 5 1.0 4.1290e-01 1.0 0.00e+00 0.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00e+00 0 0.00e+00 0<br> <span> </span>SA: col data 5 1.0 1.9127e-02 1.0 0.00e+00 0.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00e+00 0 0.00e+00 0<br> <span> </span>SA: frmProl0 5 1.0 6.2662e-01 1.0 0.00e+00 0.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00e+00 0 0.00e+00 0<br> <span> </span>SA: smooth 5 1.0 4.9595e-01 1.0 1.21e+08 1.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 244 2709 15 1.97e+02 15 2.55e+02 90<br>GAMG: partLevel 5 1.0 4.7330e-01 1.0 6.98e+08 1.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1475 4120 5 1.78e+02 10 2.55e+02 100<br>PCGAMG Squ l00 1 1.0 2.6027e+00 1.0 0.00e+00 0.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00e+00 0 0.00e+00 0<br>PCGAMG Gal l00 1 1.0 3.8406e-01 1.0 5.48e+08 1.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1426 4270 1 1.48e+02 2 2.11e+02 100<br>PCGAMG Opt l00 1 1.0 2.4932e-01 1.0 7.20e+07 1.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 289 2653 1 6.41e+01 1 1.13e+02 100<br>PCGAMG Gal l01 1 1.0 6.6279e-02 1.0 1.09e+08 1.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1645 3851 1 2.40e+01 2 3.64e+01 100<br>PCGAMG Opt l01 1 1.0 2.9544e-02 1.0 7.15e+06 1.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 242 1671 1 4.84e+00 1 1.23e+01 100<br>PCGAMG Gal l02 1 1.0 1.8874e-02 1.0 3.72e+07 1.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1974 3636 1 5.04e+00 2 6.58e+00 100<br>PCGAMG Opt l02 1 1.0 7.4353e-03 1.0 2.40e+06 1.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 323 1457 1 7.71e-01 1 2.30e+00 100<br>PCGAMG Gal l03 1 1.0 2.8479e-03 1.0 4.10e+06 1.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1440 2266 1 4.44e-01 2 5.51e-01 100<br>PCGAMG Opt l03 1 1.0 8.2684e-04 1.0 2.80e+05 1.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 339 1667 1 6.72e-02 1 2.03e-01 100<br>PCGAMG Gal l04 1 1.0 1.2238e-03 1.0 2.09e+05 1.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 170 244 1 2.05e-02 2 2.53e-02 100<br>PCGAMG Opt l04 1 1.0 4.1008e-04 1.0 1.77e+04 1.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 165 1 4.49e-03 1 1.19e-02 100<br>PCSetUp 2 1.0 9.9632e+00 1.0 4.95e+09 1.0 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 5 12 0 0 0 5 12 0 0 0 496 17826 55 1.03e+03 45 6.54e+02 98<br>PCSetUpOnBlocks 44 1.0 9.9087e-04 1.0 2.88e+03 1.0<br><br><div style="margin:0px;font-variant-numeric:normal;font-variant-east-asian:normal;font-stretch:normal;font-size:11px;line-height:normal;font-family:Menlo"><br></div><br><br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">The point of lazy initialization is to make it possible to run a solve that doesn't use a GPU in PETSC_ARCH that supports GPUs, regardless of whether a GPU is actually present.<br><br>Fande Kong <<a href="mailto:fdkong.jd@gmail.com" target="_blank">fdkong.jd@gmail.com</a>> writes:<br><br>> I spoke too soon. It seems that we have trouble creating cuda/kokkos vecs<br>> now. Got Segmentation fault.<br>><br>> Thanks,<br>><br>> Fande<br>><br>> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.<br>> 0x00002aaab5558b11 in<br>> Petsc::CUPMDevice<(Petsc::CUPMDeviceType)0>::CUPMDeviceInternal::initialize<br>> (this=0x1) at<br>> /home/kongf/workhome/sawtooth/moosegpu/petsc/src/sys/objects/device/impls/cupm/cupmdevice.cxx:54<br>> 54 PetscErrorCode CUPMDevice<T>::CUPMDeviceInternal::initialize() noexcept<br>> Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install<br>> bzip2-libs-1.0.6-13.el7.x86_64 elfutils-libelf-0.176-5.el7.x86_64<br>> elfutils-libs-0.176-5.el7.x86_64 glibc-2.17-325.el7_9.x86_64<br>> libX11-1.6.7-4.el7_9.x86_64 libXau-1.0.8-2.1.el7.x86_64<br>> libattr-2.4.46-13.el7.x86_64 libcap-2.22-11.el7.x86_64<br>> libibmad-5.4.0.MLNX20190423.1d917ae-0.1.49224.x86_64<br>> libibumad-43.1.1.MLNX20200211.078947f-0.1.49224.x86_64<br>> libibverbs-41mlnx1-OFED.4.9.0.0.7.49224.x86_64<br>> libmlx4-41mlnx1-OFED.4.7.3.0.3.49224.x86_64<br>> libmlx5-41mlnx1-OFED.4.9.0.1.2.49224.x86_64 libnl3-3.2.28-4.el7.x86_64<br>> librdmacm-41mlnx1-OFED.4.7.3.0.6.49224.x86_64<br>> librxe-41mlnx1-OFED.4.4.2.4.6.49224.x86_64 libxcb-1.13-1.el7.x86_64<br>> libxml2-2.9.1-6.el7_9.6.x86_64 numactl-libs-2.0.12-5.el7.x86_64<br>> systemd-libs-219-78.el7_9.3.x86_64 xz-libs-5.2.2-1.el7.x86_64<br>> zlib-1.2.7-19.el7_9.x86_64<br>> (gdb) bt<br>> #0 0x00002aaab5558b11 in<br>> Petsc::CUPMDevice<(Petsc::CUPMDeviceType)0>::CUPMDeviceInternal::initialize<br>> (this=0x1) at<br>> /home/kongf/workhome/sawtooth/moosegpu/petsc/src/sys/objects/device/impls/cupm/cupmdevice.cxx:54<br>> #1 0x00002aaab5558db7 in<br>> Petsc::CUPMDevice<(Petsc::CUPMDeviceType)0>::getDevice<br>> (this=this@entry=0x2aaab7f37b70<br>> <CUDADevice>, device=0x115da00, id=-35, id@entry=-1) at<br>> /home/kongf/workhome/sawtooth/moosegpu/petsc/src/sys/objects/device/impls/cupm/cupmdevice.cxx:344<br>> #2 0x00002aaab55577de in PetscDeviceCreate (type=type@entry=PETSC_DEVICE_CUDA,<br>> devid=devid@entry=-1, device=device@entry=0x2aaab7f37b48<br>> <defaultDevices+8>) at<br>> /home/kongf/workhome/sawtooth/moosegpu/petsc/src/sys/objects/device/interface/device.cxx:107<br>> #3 0x00002aaab5557b3a in PetscDeviceInitializeDefaultDevice_Internal<br>> (type=type@entry=PETSC_DEVICE_CUDA, defaultDeviceId=defaultDeviceId@entry=-1)<br>> at<br>> /home/kongf/workhome/sawtooth/moosegpu/petsc/src/sys/objects/device/interface/device.cxx:273<br>> #4 0x00002aaab5557bf6 in PetscDeviceInitialize<br>> (type=type@entry=PETSC_DEVICE_CUDA)<br>> at<br>> /home/kongf/workhome/sawtooth/moosegpu/petsc/src/sys/objects/device/interface/device.cxx:234<br>> #5 0x00002aaab5661fcd in VecCreate_SeqCUDA (V=0x115d150) at<br>> /home/kongf/workhome/sawtooth/moosegpu/petsc/src/vec/vec/impls/seq/seqcuda/veccuda.c:244<br>> #6 0x00002aaab5649b40 in VecSetType (vec=vec@entry=0x115d150,<br>> method=method@entry=0x2aaab70b45b8 "seqcuda") at<br>> /home/kongf/workhome/sawtooth/moosegpu/petsc/src/vec/vec/interface/vecreg.c:93<br>> #7 0x00002aaab579c33f in VecCreate_CUDA (v=0x115d150) at<br>> /home/kongf/workhome/sawtooth/moosegpu/petsc/src/vec/vec/impls/mpi/mpicuda/<br>><span> </span><a href="http://mpicuda.cu:214/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">mpicuda.cu:214</a><br>> #8 0x00002aaab5649b40 in VecSetType (vec=vec@entry=0x115d150,<br>> method=method@entry=0x7fffffff9260 "cuda") at<br>> /home/kongf/workhome/sawtooth/moosegpu/petsc/src/vec/vec/interface/vecreg.c:93<br>> #9 0x00002aaab5648bf1 in VecSetTypeFromOptions_Private (vec=0x115d150,<br>> PetscOptionsObject=0x7fffffff9210) at<br>> /home/kongf/workhome/sawtooth/moosegpu/petsc/src/vec/vec/interface/vector.c:1263<br>> #10 VecSetFromOptions (vec=0x115d150) at<br>> /home/kongf/workhome/sawtooth/moosegpu/petsc/src/vec/vec/interface/vector.c:1297<br>> #11 0x00002aaab02ef227 in libMesh::PetscVector<double>::init<br>> (this=0x11cd1a0, n=441, n_local=441, fast=false, ptype=libMesh::PARALLEL)<br>> at<br>> /home/kongf/workhome/sawtooth/moosegpu/scripts/../libmesh/installed/include/libmesh/petsc_vector.h:693<br>><br>> On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 1:09 PM Fande Kong <<a href="mailto:fdkong.jd@gmail.com" target="_blank">fdkong.jd@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>><br>>> Thanks, Jed,<br>>><br>>> This worked!<br>>><br>>> Fande<br>>><br>>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 11:03 PM Jed Brown <<a href="mailto:jed@jedbrown.org" target="_blank">jed@jedbrown.org</a>> wrote:<br>>><br>>>> Fande Kong <<a href="mailto:fdkong.jd@gmail.com" target="_blank">fdkong.jd@gmail.com</a>> writes:<br>>>><br>>>> > On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 11:39 AM Jacob Faibussowitsch <<br>>>><span> </span><a href="mailto:jacob.fai@gmail.com" target="_blank">jacob.fai@gmail.com</a>><br>>>> > wrote:<br>>>> ><br>>>> >> Are you running on login nodes or compute nodes (I can’t seem to tell<br>>>> from<br>>>> >> the configure.log)?<br>>>> >><br>>>> ><br>>>> > I was compiling codes on login nodes, and running codes on compute<br>>>> nodes.<br>>>> > Login nodes do not have GPUs, but compute nodes do have GPUs.<br>>>> ><br>>>> > Just to be clear, the same thing (code, machine) with PETSc-3.16.1<br>>>> worked<br>>>> > perfectly. I have this trouble with PETSc-main.<br>>>><br>>>> I assume you can<br>>>><br>>>> export PETSC_OPTIONS='-device_enable lazy'<br>>>><br>>>> and it'll work.<br>>>><br>>>> I think this should be the default. The main complaint is that timing the<br>>>> first GPU-using event isn't accurate if it includes initialization, but I<br>>>> think this is mostly hypothetical because you can't trust any timing that<br>>>> doesn't preload in some form and the first GPU-using event will almost<br>>>> always be something uninteresting so I think it will rarely lead to<br>>>> confusion. Meanwhile, eager initialization is viscerally disruptive for<br>>>> lots of people.<br>>>><br>>><br></blockquote></div></div></blockquote></div><br clear="all"><div><br></div>--<span> </span><br><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div>What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.<br>-- Norbert Wiener</div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/" target="_blank">https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/</a></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></blockquote></div></div>
</blockquote></div>