<div dir="ltr">I don't think function pointers to PETSc (DS and DM) methods are not going to work in Fortran:<div><br></div><div> ierr = PetscDSAddBoundary(prob, DM_BC_NATURAL_RIEMANN, "inflow", "Face Sets", 0, 0, NULL, (void (*)(void)) PhysicsBoundary_Advect_Inflow, NULL, ALEN(inflowids), inflowids, phys);CHKERRQ(ierr);<br></div><div><br></div><div>You could write a funcs.c file that you call from your fortran code, like, call setBC1(prob,...,ierr)</div><div><br></div><div>and put PhysicsBoundary_Advect_Inflow and setBC1 in funcs.c, for instance. </div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 5:32 AM Thibault Bridel-Bertomeu <<a href="mailto:thibault.bridelbertomeu@gmail.com">thibault.bridelbertomeu@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Good morning all, <div><br></div><div>Thank you Barry for your answer.</div><div>I started adding some interfaces (PetscFVSetComponentName, PetscFVView & PetscFVSetType so far) and I have to say I think it is working quite well, but the prototypes of those functions are still quite "simple".</div><div>I am stuck at how to implement the wrappers for PetscDSSetRiemannSolver and PetscDSSetContext though, especially on how to pass a function as an argument to PetscDSSetRiemannSolver ... Are there any similar functions that may already have their wrappers ?</div><div><br></div><div>Thank you very much, </div><div><br></div><div><div><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div><div>Thibault</div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Le sam. 12 déc. 2020 à 23:28, Barry Smith <<a href="mailto:bsmith@petsc.dev" target="_blank">bsmith@petsc.dev</a>> a écrit :<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div><br><div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div>On Dec 12, 2020, at 2:59 PM, Thibault Bridel-Bertomeu <<a href="mailto:thibault.bridelbertomeu@gmail.com" target="_blank">thibault.bridelbertomeu@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br><div><div dir="auto">Dear Jed, dear Barry,</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Thank you for the fast answers ! </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">If I have any success I will make sure to make a pull request to provide some version of ex11 in Fortran. </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Regarding the stubs, I admit I started looking in that direction to add the missing wrappers but I am not sure I fully understand the process yet. </div><div dir="auto">For each C function, I gotta provide a Fortran interface in a .h90 file as well as a C function that has a Fortran-like prototype and calls the C function - right ?</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div> Yes,</div><div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="auto"> However there are a few things I could not find / understand yet. </div><div dir="auto">For instance, it appears that for C functions that have character string arguments take an extra argument in their Fortran-like-prototype-wrapper, namely the length of the string. Is that passed automatically ? I couldn’t find where it could come from ...</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div> This secret argument is put automatically by the Fortran compiler.</div><div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="auto">Another thing is for functions like PetscFVView. I guess the wrapping is less straightforward because I tried a quick something and it segfault’ed. I couldnt find the wrapper for DMView although there is such a routine in Fortran too. Could you please detail how to wrap such functions ? </div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>PETSC_EXTERN void dmview_(DM *da,PetscViewer *vin,PetscErrorCode *ierr)</div><div>{</div><div> PetscViewer v;</div><div> PetscPatchDefaultViewers_Fortran(vin,v);</div><div> *ierr = DMView(*da,v);</div><div>}</div><div><br></div><div>dm/interface/ftn-custom/zdmf.c</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Thank you very much again,</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Thibault Bridel-Bertomeu</div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Le sam. 12 déc. 2020 à 21:48, Barry Smith <<a href="mailto:bsmith@petsc.dev" target="_blank">bsmith@petsc.dev</a>> a écrit :<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div><div><br></div> PETSc Fortran interfaces are a combination of automatically generated and manually generated. <div><br></div><div> For any C PETSc function if the manual page begins with /*@ it generates the Fortran interface automatically (make allfortranstubs). If it begins /*@C then either the Fortran interface is done manually or is missing. </div><div><br></div><div> C functions that have character string arguments or function arguments (or a few other special cases) need to be manually provided. The automatically generated stubs go in the directory ftn-auto while manually generated ones go in the directory fin-custom.</div><div><br></div><div> Perhaps you could first generate a list of "missing" Fortran stubs and then for each stub determine why it is missing and if it can be provided. Some are likely easy to provide but a few (involving function arguments) will be more involved. Once you have all the stubs available translating ex11.c becomes straightforward.</div></div><div><div><br></div><div> Barry</div><div><br><div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div>On Dec 12, 2020, at 9:30 AM, Thibault Bridel-Bertomeu <<a href="mailto:thibault.bridelbertomeu@gmail.com" target="_blank">thibault.bridelbertomeu@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br><div><div dir="ltr"><div>Dear all, </div><div><br></div><div>Is there somewhere a version of the TS tutorial ex11.c in Fortran ?</div><div>I am looking into building in F90 (let's say that it is an unavoidable constraint) an unstructured 3D solver of the Euler equations using the "new" features of PETSc - mostly DMPlex & PetscFV - but I think there are some interfaces missing and I find it hard to find workarounds in Fortran. I would be grateful if anyone could please give me some pointers ...</div><div><br></div><div>Thank you very much in advance,</div><br clear="all"><div><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div><div>Thibault Bridel-Bertomeu<br>—<br></div></div></div></div>Eng, MSc, PhD</div><div>Research Engineer</div><div>CEA/CESTA</div><div>33114 LE BARP</div><div>Tel.: (+33)557046924</div><div>Mob.: (+33)611025322<br></div><div>Mail: <a href="mailto:thibault.bridelbertomeu@gmail.com" target="_blank">thibault.bridelbertomeu@gmail.com</a><br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>
</div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></blockquote></div></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div><div>Thibault Bridel-Bertomeu<br>—<br></div></div></div></div>Eng, MSc, PhD</div><div>Research Engineer</div><div>CEA/CESTA</div><div>33114 LE BARP</div><div>Tel.: (+33)557046924</div><div>Mob.: (+33)611025322<br></div><div>Mail: <a href="mailto:thibault.bridelbertomeu@gmail.com" target="_blank">thibault.bridelbertomeu@gmail.com</a><br></div></div></div></div></div></div>
</div></blockquote></div><br></div></blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>