<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Hi,<br>
<br>
I have attached 3 results using 12,24 and 32 processors. I am
using a completely different clusters and I'm testing if it's the
cluster configuration problems. It's seems that VecScatterEnd does
not scale well from 12 to 24 to 32. Does these results show that
there's problems with the partition still? My partition is
clustered closely at the center, I'm wondering if this has a great
effect on scaling...<br>
<br>
Tks! <br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Yours sincerely,
TAY wee-beng</pre>
On 6/10/2012 11:54 PM, Jed Brown wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAM9tzSkwW5S5YfpsjbfUaVVFJbaeYoWmGbhjwCzNarx+dPS5ug@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 4:51 PM, TAY wee-beng <span
dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:zonexo@gmail.com" target="_blank">zonexo@gmail.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
This line happens rather late in the assembly, so it is not
the main matrix which I've created, right? And hence this
doesn't matter?</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<div>Look at all the lines talking about mallocs. If the first
assembly uses lots of mallocs, the first assembly will be slow.</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>