<div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 9:28 AM, w_ang_temp <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:w_ang_temp@163.com" target="_blank">w_ang_temp@163.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="line-height:1.7;font-size:14px;font-family:arial"><div>Hello Jed</div>
<div> It is true that LTR is uninitialized. </div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>There are lots of ways for uninitialized variables to accidentally have valid values. That doesn't mean your program is correct, it just means that it accidentally "worked". You have to fix your code.</div>
<div><br></div><div><a href="http://fortran90.org/src/best-practices.html#file-input-output">http://fortran90.org/src/best-practices.html#file-input-output</a></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="line-height:1.7;font-size:14px;font-family:arial"><div>But before the reconfiguration, it is ok by the default compiler. The codes are the same <span>before and after</span> the reconfiguration. </div>
<div> Also I use ifort to compile the fortran project before I add petsc code to it and it is ok. So I think that this line (line 126) should not be incorrect when use ifort.</div>
<div> <span>Maybe</span> <span>there's</span> <span>any other</span> <span>reason <span>related</span> to the new <span>compiler.</span></span></div>
<div> Thanks.</div>
<div> Jim<br></div><div class="im">>At 2012-06-02 22:13:06,"Jed Brown" <<a href="mailto:jedbrown@mcs.anl.gov" target="_blank">jedbrown@mcs.anl.gov</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT:#ccc 1px solid;MARGIN:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;PADDING-LEFT:1ex">>Looks like LTR is uninitialized or has been overwritten by earlier corruption. This does not have anything to do with PETSc.<br>
<br></blockquote></div></div><br><br><span title="neteasefooter"><span></span></span></blockquote></div><br>