<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 23:18, Barry Smith <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bsmith@mcs.anl.gov">bsmith@mcs.anl.gov</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I have not tried complex quad precision. If you are right than it may not be possible right out of the box with std:complex. We are not in position to provide a proper complex class for this case (for the same reasons I listed before) so if someone wants PETSc with complex quad they may have their work cut out for them.</blockquote>
</div><br><div>It's spelled __complex128. <a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.6.2/libquadmath.pdf">http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.6.2/libquadmath.pdf</a></div><div><br></div><div>Perhaps it's a shame they didn't use C99 complex __float128, but such is life.</div>
</div>