On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Sean Farley <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sean@mcs.anl.gov">sean@mcs.anl.gov</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="gmail_quote"><div>Jed, could this be the mismatch between SuperLU and the new ParMetis?</div>
</div></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>Looking at his configure line, I don't see --download-metis, which would mean that he isn't using the new parmetis. Also, he didn't compile --with-64-indices, so he's not using any of the custom patch for SuperLU_DIST.</div>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br>So there would not be the problem with empty domains? I could see it happening for this many processes.<div><br></div><div> Matt<br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.<br>
-- Norbert Wiener<br>
</div>