On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Dominik Szczerba <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dominik@itis.ethz.ch">dominik@itis.ethz.ch</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class="h5">On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Jed Brown <<a href="mailto:jedbrown@mcs.anl.gov">jedbrown@mcs.anl.gov</a>> wrote:<br>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 09:04, Dominik Szczerba <<a href="mailto:dominik@itis.ethz.ch">dominik@itis.ethz.ch</a>><br>
> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> That probably explains at least to some extent why it takes 1h or my<br>
>> Windows box and only minutes on my linux installation...<br>
><br>
> Configure is independent of cmake/legacy builds. Most of the difference is<br>
> likely coming from disk performance.<br>
<br>
</div></div>Quite so, it is configure that takes a lot of time.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>The claim is that this is a mismatch between Cygwin and Windows. I see not reason to dispute this.</div><div><br></div><div>
Matt</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><font color="#888888"><br>
Dominik<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.<br>
-- Norbert Wiener<br>