Unfortunately, I am still forced to use version 3.1. I will come back to this issue after the upgrade to 3.2, which should be next week.<div><br></div><div>Many thanks,</div><div>Dominik<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Barry Smith <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bsmith@mcs.anl.gov">bsmith@mcs.anl.gov</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><br>
Dominik,<br>
<br>
This should not happen. Does this happen with petsc-3.2? Note that we are now supporting PETSc 3.2 and if the problem does not exist in 3.2 we will not fix it in 3.1. If it exists in 3.2 we will definitely fix it. Can you send us a small piece of code that exhibits this behavior or point to a PETSc example that exhibits this behavior so we can reproduce it and fix the error in 3.2<br>
<br>
Barry<br>
<br>
We have specific code that prevents the<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5">On Oct 21, 2011, at 4:18 AM, Dominik Szczerba wrote:<br>
<br>
> I am getting this error when performing a series of KSP solves. Removing "-ksp_monitor_true_residual" from options removes the error, but I would like to see the residues on screen.<br>
><br>
> I do not seem to find any functions in the docu to set max number of KSP monitors, but even if there is one - is it really wasteful to monitor each solve of my system?<br>
><br>
> Thanks,<br>
> Dominik<br>
><br>
> [0]PETSC ERROR: --------------------- Error Message ------------------------------------<br>
> [0]PETSC ERROR: Argument out of range!<br>
> [0]PETSC ERROR: Too many KSP monitors set!<br>
> [0]PETSC ERROR: ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
> [0]PETSC ERROR: Petsc Release Version 3.1.0, Patch 8, Thu Mar 17 13:37:48 CDT 2011<br>
><br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>