On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Dominik Szczerba <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dominik@itis.ethz.ch">dominik@itis.ethz.ch</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Jed Brown <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jedbrown@mcs.anl.gov" target="_blank">jedbrown@mcs.anl.gov</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="gmail_quote"><div>On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 06:38, Dominik Szczerba <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dominik@itis.ethz.ch" target="_blank">dominik@itis.ethz.ch</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>Is it legal to call KSPSolve with the solution vector being a<br>
ghost-aware vector created e.g. with VecCreateGhost?<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>Yes</div><div><div><br></div></div></div></blockquote><div>Would that also mean, that 'b' vector can also be ghosted? That would be really cool...</div>
</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>In PETSc, ghosted vectors just have extra information, so they can always be used as</div><div>normal vectors.</div><div><br></div><div> Matt</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="gmail_quote"><div>Many thanks,</div><div>Dominik </div></div></blockquote></div>-- <br>What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.<br>
-- Norbert Wiener<br>