This is not an efficient parallel operation. You should probably rework your algorithm<br>so that it is not necessary.<br><br> Matt<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 6:01 AM, Umut Tabak <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:u.tabak@tudelft.nl">u.tabak@tudelft.nl</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Dear all,<br>
<br>
I would like to set a column of a matrix, I read through the manual<br>
pages a bit... Since the matrices are row oriented in PETSc and<br>
there is a function MatSetValuesRow, I guess transposing my<br>
original matrix and then using this function is the best option I<br>
could see for the moment. Could you comment on this?<br>
<br>
BR,<br>
Umut<br>
<font color="#888888">--<br>
Quote: I love the name of honor, more than I fear death.<br>
Author: Julius Caesar 101-44 BC, Roman Emperor<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.<br>-- Norbert Wiener<br>