<div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Barry Smith <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bsmith@mcs.anl.gov">bsmith@mcs.anl.gov</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid"><br> Satish,<br><br> Could you please convert these (both the stub code and the F90 interface) to use a 1d array? In both 3.0.0 and petsc-dev.</blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div>I am still against this, since it seems much nicer to get a 2D array</div>
<div>for the dense matrix, which is the ONLY matrix for which GetArray()</div>
<div>makes any sense I think.</div>
<div> </div>
<div> Matt</div>
<div> </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid"><span id=""></span><br> Thanks<br><font color="#888888"><br> Barry</font>
<div>
<div></div>
<div class="h5"><br>On Jun 30, 2009, at 6:37 PM, Jed Brown wrote:<br><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Matthew Knepley wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">I thought the idea was that MatGetArray() never applies to a sparse<br>matrix. No other sparse format supports this, does it?<br>
</blockquote><br>That's not true at all, but the result is implementation-dependent. For<br>example, the array for AIJ is different from the array for BAIJ. For<br>this reason, you shouldn't be calling MatGetArray unless you know the<br>
matrix type, but of course the F90 interface should agree with the C<br>interface.<br><br>Jed<br><br></blockquote><br></div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all">
<div></div><br>-- <br>What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.<br>-- Norbert Wiener<br>