Thanks!<br>but i read that for one number specifyc of elements parmetis is recommended..in my case i used a mesh with 8million ....<br><br>But i read that the people recommended one quantity....<br>I try to know waht quantity is....
<br><br>Thanks again :P<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 5/8/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Matthew Knepley</b> <<a href="mailto:knepley@gmail.com">knepley@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I am fairly sure that Metis and ParMetis use the same serial partitioner, or<br>at least it is possible to do so. There are a lot of options, and the particular<br>choice will affect performance.<br><br> Matt<br><br>On 5/8/07, Niriedith Karina <
<a href="mailto:niriedith@gmail.com">niriedith@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>> Hi Everybody! :D<br>><br>> I used Metis and Parmetis for partitioning. And i see that metis is faster<br>> than parmetis , so my question is.. for what number of elements is more
<br>> efficient use parmetis? ....<br>><br>> my mesh is a tetrahedra...<br>><br>> Thanks anyway!<br>><br><br><br>--<br>The government saving money is like me spilling beer. It happens, but<br>never on purpose.
<br><br></blockquote></div><br>