No there is no randomness. I suspect the matrix/rhs is not the same.<br><br> Matt<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 2/14/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">LECAS Dimitri</b> <<a href="mailto:dimitri.lecas@c-s.fr">
dimitri.lecas@c-s.fr</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Hello<br><br>I'm surprised to not have the same numbers of iterations when i run
<br>several instance of my program with the same number of processors and<br>the same matrix/right hand side. Is there some random or it's<br>asynchronous message passing fault ?<br><br>PS: My code used KSPSolve with bicg and jacobi for pc)
<br><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>One trouble is that despite this system, anyone who reads journals widely<br>and critically is forced to realize that there are scarcely any bars to eventual<br>publication. There seems to be no study too fragmented, no hypothesis too
<br>trivial, no literature citation too biased or too egotistical, no design too<br>warped, no methodology too bungled, no presentation of results too<br>inaccurate, too obscure, and too contradictory, no analysis too self-serving,
<br>no argument too circular, no conclusions too trifling or too unjustified, and<br>no grammar and syntax too offensive for a paper to end up in print. -- Drummond Rennie