[petsc-users] odd behavior when using lapack's dgeev with petsc

Manav Bhatia bhatiamanav at gmail.com
Sat Apr 8 23:21:17 CDT 2017


It turned out to be another third-party library that had some functions names same as those from BLAS.  This was confusing LAPACK. 
Building without that library is leading to expected results from the code. 

What I don’t understand is why this shows up on one platform out of the four different OSs that I have been using this code on. 

-Manav

> On Apr 8, 2017, at 2:20 AM, Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> 
> I would do a minimal petsc build - without any packages from
> /usr/local - and see if the problem presists..
> 
> Satish
> 
> On Fri, 7 Apr 2017, Barry Smith wrote:
> 
>> 
>>> On Apr 7, 2017, at 3:34 PM, Manav Bhatia <bhatiamanav at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Yes, I printed the data in both cases and they look the same. 
>>> 
>>> I also used “set step-mode on” to show the system lapack info, and they both are using the same lapack routine. 
>>> 
>>> This is still baffling me. 
>> 
>>   alignment of the input arrays, both the same? 
>> 
>>   I don't know why this is happening; what if you use your standalone code but link against all the libraries that are linked against for the PETSc case.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> -Manav
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Apr 7, 2017, at 3:22 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Apr 7, 2017, at 2:57 PM, Manav Bhatia <bhatiamanav at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Barry, 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks for the inputs. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I did try that, but the debugger (gdb) stepped right over the dgeev_ call, without getting inside the function. 
>>>> 
>>>> Did it at least stop at the function so you do an up and print all the arguments passed in?
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I am wondering if this has anything to do with the fact that the system lapack library might not have any debugging info in it. 
>>>> 
>>>> Yeah I forgot it might not have them.
>>>> 
>>>> Barry
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thoughts? 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Manav
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Apr 7, 2017, at 2:40 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Apr 7, 2017, at 1:46 PM, Manav Bhatia <bhatiamanav at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi, 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I have compile petsc on my Ubuntu machine (also Mac OS 10.12 separately) to link to the system lapack and blas libraries (shown below). 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I have created an interface class to dgeev in lapack to calculate the eigenvalues of a matrix. 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> My application code links to multiple libraries: libMesh, petsc, slepc, hdf5, etc. 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> If I test my interface inside this application code, I get junk results. 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This is easy to debug because you have a version that works.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Run both versions in separate windows each in a debugger and put a break point in the dgeev_ function. When it gets there check that it is the same dgeev_ function in both cases and check that the inputs are the same then step through both to see when things start to change between the two.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> However, on the same machine, if I use the interface in a separate main() function without linking to any of the libraries except lapack and blas, then I get expected results. 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Also, this problem does not show up on Mac. 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I am not sure what could be causing this and don’t quite know where to start. Could Petsc have anything to do with this? 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Any insight would be greatly appreciated. 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Manav
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> manav at manav1:~/test$ ldd /opt/local/lib/libpetsc.so
>>>>>>> 	linux-vdso.so.1 =>  (0x00007fff3e7a8000)
>>>>>>> 	libsuperlu_dist.so.5 => /opt/local/lib/libsuperlu_dist.so.5 (0x00007f721fbd1000)
>>>>>>> 	libparmetis.so => /opt/local/lib/libparmetis.so (0x00007f721f990000)
>>>>>>> 	libmetis.so => /opt/local/lib/libmetis.so (0x00007f721f718000)
>>>>>>> 	libsuperlu.so.5 => /opt/local/lib/libsuperlu.so.5 (0x00007f721f4a7000)
>>>>>>> 	libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00007f721f124000)
>>>>>>> 	liblapack.so.3 => /usr/lib/liblapack.so.3 (0x00007f721e92c000)
>>>>>>> 	libblas.so.3 => /usr/lib/libblas.so.3 (0x00007f721e6bd000)
>>>>>>> 	libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6 (0x00007f721e382000)
>>>>>>> 	libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x00007f721e079000)
>>>>>>> 	libmpi_mpifh.so.12 => /usr/lib/libmpi_mpifh.so.12 (0x00007f721de20000)
>>>>>>> 	libgfortran.so.3 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgfortran.so.3 (0x00007f721daf4000)
>>>>>>> 	libdl.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x00007f721d8f0000)
>>>>>>> 	libmpi.so.12 => /usr/lib/libmpi.so.12 (0x00007f721d61a000)
>>>>>>> 	libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007f721d403000)
>>>>>>> 	libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007f721d1e6000)
>>>>>>> 	libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007f721ce1d000)
>>>>>>> 	/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x000055d739f1b000)
>>>>>>> 	libxcb.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb.so.1 (0x00007f721cbcf000)
>>>>>>> 	libopen-pal.so.13 => /usr/lib/libopen-pal.so.13 (0x00007f721c932000)
>>>>>>> 	libquadmath.so.0 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libquadmath.so.0 (0x00007f721c6f2000)
>>>>>>> 	libibverbs.so.1 => /usr/lib/libibverbs.so.1 (0x00007f721c4e3000)
>>>>>>> 	libopen-rte.so.12 => /usr/lib/libopen-rte.so.12 (0x00007f721c269000)
>>>>>>> 	libXau.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXau.so.6 (0x00007f721c064000)
>>>>>>> 	libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x00007f721be5e000)
>>>>>>> 	librt.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librt.so.1 (0x00007f721bc56000)
>>>>>>> 	libutil.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libutil.so.1 (0x00007f721ba52000)
>>>>>>> 	libhwloc.so.5 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libhwloc.so.5 (0x00007f721b818000)
>>>>>>> 	libnuma.so.1 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnuma.so.1 (0x00007f721b60c000)
>>>>>>> 	libltdl.so.7 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libltdl.so.7 (0x00007f721b402000)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 



More information about the petsc-users mailing list