[petsc-users] DMShellSetCreateRestriction

Boris Kaus kaus at uni-mainz.de
Fri Mar 11 17:32:42 CST 2016


Thanks - that would be great!

> On Mar 11, 2016, at 10:25 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> 
> 
>  Boris,
> 
>    We will add this support to the DMShell and its usage from PCMG within a few days.
> 
>   Barry
> 
>> On Mar 11, 2016, at 3:39 PM, Boris Kaus <kaus at uni-mainz.de> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Mar 11, 2016, at 8:53 PM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Dave May <dave.mayhem23 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 11 March 2016 at 18:11, anton <popov at uni-mainz.de> wrote:
>>> Hi team,
>>> 
>>> I'm implementing staggered grid in a PETSc-canonical way, trying to build a custom DM object, attach it to SNES, that should later transfered it further to KSP and PC.
>>> 
>>> Yet, the Galerking coarsening for staggered grid is non-symmetric. The question is how possible is it that DMShellSetCreateRestriction can be implemented and included in 3.7 release?
>>> 
>>> It's a little more work than just adding a new method within the DM and a new APIs for DMCreateRestriction() and DMShellSetCreateRestriction().
>>> PCMG needs to be modified to call DMCreateRestriction(). 
>>> 
>>> Dave is correct. Currently, PCMG only calls DMCreateInterpolation(). We would need to add a DMCreateRestriction() call.
>> The PCMG object already uses a restriction operator that is different from the interpolation parameter if it is specified with PCMGSetRestriction. 
>> For consistency, one would expect a similar DMCreateRestriction object, not? I realize that this is not relevant for FEM codes, but for staggered FD it makes quite some difference. 
>> 
>> Other suggestions on how to best integrate staggered finite differences within the current PETSc framework are ofcourse also highly welcome. 
>> Our current thinking was to pack it into a DMSHELL (which has the problem of not having a restriction interface). 
>> 
>> thanks,
>> Boris
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>>  Thanks,
>>> 
>>>    Matt
>>> 
>>> Please, please.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Anton
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.
>>> -- Norbert Wiener
>> 
> 



More information about the petsc-users mailing list