[petsc-users] PCGASM in Fortran

[Luc Berger-Vergiat]

Ok,
I'll check PCASM instead.

Thanks

Best,
Luc

On 04/24/2015 02:42 PM, Dmitry Karpeyev wrote:
> Unless you need subdomains that live on more than one processor, you 
> should use PCASM.  If you do need PCGASM, it is undergoing a major 
> overhaul that will be ready in a couple of weeks.
>
> Dmitry.
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 1:36 PM Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com 
> <mailto:knepley at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Luc Berger-Vergiat
>     <lb2653 at columbia.edu <mailto:lb2653 at columbia.edu>> wrote:
>
>         Hi all,
>         I am trying to use the restricted additive Schwarz
>         preconditioner for my problem but most of the fortran stub are
>         not available for the functions related to domain
>         decomposition (e.g. PCGASMSetSubdomains is not available so I
>         can't assign subdomains).
>         Is there a reason for this? Is there an easy work-around? Or
>         should I just re-implement additive Schwarz in Fortran (that's
>         not to hard in serial but I'm not sure about the parallel
>         version).
>
>
>     Can you just use PCASM, which has the all bindings?
>
>       Thanks,
>
>         Matt
>
>         Thanks for your help!
>
>         -- 
>         Best,
>         Luc
>
>
>
>
>
>     -- 
>     What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>     experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to
>     which their experiments lead.
>     -- Norbert Wiener
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20150424/bdbbcd35/attachment.html>