[petsc-users] Row Orderings of Mat and Vec

[Hui Zhang]

>> On Feb 1, 2012, at 5:02 AM, Hui Zhang wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jan 31, 2012, at 1:23 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 04:11, Hui Zhang <mike.hui.zhang at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Suppose using MatCreate() and MatSetSizes() we obtain a Mat A, and then
>>>> tion and then using local indices (e.g. MatSetValuesLocal()) during assembly. You might use AO for that setup step, but it usually doesn't make sense to use _during_ assembly.
>>> 
>>> thanks, do you mean that it is faster to use LocaltoGlobalMapping & SetValuesLocal
>>> than to use AO & SetValues globally? Is there a big difference in performance?
>> 
>>  Yes, using the SetValuesLocal approach will be much faster for large problems than using the AO to map to global indices and calling SetValues.
>> 
>>  Barry
> 
> Thank you! Can I use SetValuesLocal to set values beyond LocalOwnershipRange?

It is ok. I found I can.


> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> with
>>>> P_1 the permutation corresponding to ao_1.  In a similar way, we have that b
>>>> becomes P_2 b under the petsc ordering.  I want to make sure P_1 and P_2 are
>>>> the same so arises my question.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks a lot!
>>>> Hui
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>