<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 16/10/17 14:14, Matthew Knepley
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAMYG4GnheyHgGsuB1_fjY+R4s7q_=44K0Rh=uYtLrX3WdMCc_A@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote"><span class=""></span><br>
<span class=""></span> This last file petscao.h is including
a "petsc/finclude/petscao.h", which contains various
definitions including the definition of AO. Do I need to
make some sort of similar "petsc/finclude/petscsf.h"?<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> <br>
It looks like PetscSF is already defined inside
petsc/finclude/petscis.h. It's not clear to me which
bits of the SF interface need to be in their own files
and which are lumped in with the IS interface.</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>If SF is already in the IS part then we do not
technically need to move it out. It just seems to me that
it would be cleaner to do so.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
So do you think the SF stuff in petsc/finclude/petscis.h should be
taken out, and put into a new petsc/finclude/petscsf.h ?<br>
<br>
- Adrian<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Dr Adrian Croucher
Senior Research Fellow
Department of Engineering Science
University of Auckland, New Zealand
email: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:a.croucher@auckland.ac.nz">a.croucher@auckland.ac.nz</a>
tel: +64 (0)9 923 4611
</pre>
</body>
</html>