<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Jed Brown <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jed@jedbrown.org" target="_blank">jed@jedbrown.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">Gautam Bisht <<a href="mailto:gbisht@lbl.gov">gbisht@lbl.gov</a>> writes:<br>
<br>
> All,<br>
><br>
> Is there a reference that PETSc Tutorial slides<br>
</span>> <<a href="http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/documentation/tutorials/TutorialCEMRACS2016.pdf" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/<wbr>documentation/tutorials/<wbr>TutorialCEMRACS2016.pdf</a>><br>
<span class="">> (slide-20) reports<br>
> on using "PFLOTRAN with 500 billion unknowns"?<br>
<br>
</span>I think that was UNIC, circa 2009 on BG/P.  It is higher now (recent<br>
Gordon Bells), though I find this metric next to meaningless.<br>
</blockquote></div><br>If by meaningless you mean it will not help YOU judge a piece of software, fine. However,</div><div class="gmail_extra">if you mean its meaningless to put in a proposal, I think you are wrong, since many people</div><div class="gmail_extra">might be convinced by this.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">   Matt<br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.<br>-- Norbert Wiener</div>
</div></div>