<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Sean Farley <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sean.michael.farley@gmail.com" target="_blank">sean.michael.farley@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":332">Well … did you try this with the equivalent mercurial feature:<br>

largefiles? </div></blockquote><div><br></div><div style>Nope, feel free. Most of the speedup is independent of the large files (which only change the git repo size from 78MB to 50MB).</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div id=":332">Which version of mercurial is this? </div></blockquote><div><br>2.4.2</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div id=":332">Also, what files did<br>
you deem were "fat" </div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><div>A smattering of powerpoint slides, pdfs, random binaries, and a few very large log files. Note that this was a performance experiment and don't care about which files. In practice, I'd suggest managing fewer (or even none).</div>
<div><br></div><div><a href="https://bitbucket.org/jedbrown/petsc-git-lean/src/70e3b17f35e0e8b32ab8f81ba0df412adfccadbd/.gitattributes?at=master">https://bitbucket.org/jedbrown/petsc-git-lean/src/70e3b17f35e0e8b32ab8f81ba0df412adfccadbd/.gitattributes?at=master</a></div>
</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":332">(horrible name, by the way)?</div>
</blockquote></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra" style>Heh, well, I wanted to name it "blaze", but decided to use a name that wasn't taken.</div></div>