<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 1/10/13 12:02 AM, Jed Brown wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAM9tzS=is32wXAPU3i2T64J7xxN9znzW7w614uHpwid9tkMcqw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:46 PM, Sean
Farley <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:sean.michael.farley@gmail.com"
target="_blank">sean.michael.farley@gmail.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
[...]<br>
It should be obvious that I started the thread mostly to
instigate. I didn't expect the trolling conditions to be so
good tonight. ;-D<br>
<br>
However, you'll notice quite a number of rants within our
circles on G+ (and at large) from people that used hg for a
long time and haven't looked back since switching to git. The
opposite is rare to non-existent. In the end, I don't think
it's deeply important either way, but a lot of our "peer"
projects have recently switched for technical reasons and it's
potentially fewer tools to install/systems to remember. Oh,
and the git emacs support is so much better.</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
Emacs support? Oh, but I'm a Vim user! I used to be an Emacs user,
actually, but I switched because I decided that Emacs was too
bloated.<br>
<br>
Now *there's* some good trolling material! =)<br>
<br>
--Richard<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Richard Tran Mills, Ph.D.
Computational Earth Scientist | Joint Assistant Professor
Hydrogeochemical Dynamics Team | EECS and Earth & Planetary Sciences
Oak Ridge National Laboratory | University of Tennessee, Knoxville
E-mail: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:rmills@ornl.gov">rmills@ornl.gov</a> V: 865-241-3198 <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://climate.ornl.gov/~rmills">http://climate.ornl.gov/~rmills</a>
</pre>
</body>
</html>