I pushed a simple update a couple days ago for this. Now for something harder, can we have a system for rating examples by their approachability and quality? Should we just do text on the first line (e.g. "Intermediate, recommended")? Or a more semantic system?<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 19:32, Jed Brown <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jedbrown@mcs.anl.gov">jedbrown@mcs.anl.gov</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im"><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 19:24, Barry Smith <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bsmith@mcs.anl.gov" target="_blank">bsmith@mcs.anl.gov</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div> Jed,<br>
<br>
It is in the most obvious place. The rule html: in conf/rules Don't you do all your text processing in make?</div></blockquote></div><br></div><div>I prefer to use return-to-libc buffer overflow exploits in /bin/true.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Unfortunately, they aren't very portable because some arcane systems have a /bin/true that does nothing successfully without libc.</div>
</blockquote></div><br>