<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">I was assuming context data was stuffed in a Mat. So whatever your context object is can be used in the solve phase, just passed through to the apply operator. A graph is just needed for setup, for the ISs.<div><br></div><div>Mark<br><div><br><div><div>On Dec 23, 2011, at 2:33 PM, Jed Brown wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 13:31, Mark F. Adams <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mark.adams@columbia.edu">mark.adams@columbia.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>Ah yes, by "mat" I'm assuming a shell in this case. The construction of these ISs needs a graph -- its not magic -- its a parallel multiplicative method.</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes, the user should provide a Mat so that the library can build the ISs, but the user shouldn't get a Mat back in their callback because they are being asked to perform a nonlinear operation that does not use a Mat.</div>
<div><br></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div></body></html>