<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Hi Jed,<div><font class="Apple-style-span" size="3"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 12px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><br></span></span></font></div><div><div>
</div>
<div><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; font-family: Helvetica; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium; "><blockquote type="cite"><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><br></font></blockquote><br>Does it "stand alone" in any sense, or does it rely on large external<br>dependencies like your p-FEM library? From the above, It sounds like<br>the tests can stand alone, in which case they would certainly be<br>welcome.<br></span></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes, these are single files, similar to ex4.c, and they compile just like the other PETSc</div><div>examples. Should I mail you directly the files?</div><br><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; font-family: Helvetica; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium; "><br>BTW, I've done some work on this with unstructured grids.<br><br><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10915-010-9396-8">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10915-010-9396-8</a><br></span></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Very interesting. Sounds like you were aiming to do something similar to what we are</div><div>doing - reduce memory but still maintain a degree of robustness. Any chance you can </div><div>send me a copy of that paper.</div><div><br></div><div>We have a paper coming out soon and will be continuing work and hoping to produce a few </div><div>more papers. If it is easy we could easily compare to your work. We are currently only </div><div>concerned with the linear aspect of the problem.</div><div><br></div><div>Travis</div><br><blockquote type="cite"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; font-family: Helvetica; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 0px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; font-size: medium; "><br>I'd be interested to compare experiences.<br><br>Jed</span></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>